Literature DB >> 11833989

Benefits of syllabic input compression for users of cochlear implants.

Hugh J McDermott1, Katherine R Henshall, Colette M McKay.   

Abstract

Ten users of multielectrode cochlear implants participated in an evaluation of the perceptual effects of input-signal compression. A syllabic compressor was introduced into the microphone circuit of Spectra-22 or SPrint sound processors. The post-compression gain was adjusted to provide similar loudness for speech at an average level of 65 dBA with compression either enabled or disabled. Sentence recognition was measured at three levels. Averaged across all listeners, statistically significant score increases were obtained at each level with compression enabled (45 dBA: 19.6 percentage points, p < .0001; 55 dBA: 16.6 percentage points, p < .0001; 70 dBA: 3.1 percentage points, p = .031). A test of speech intelligibility in noise showed no significant effect of compression. Generally, participants in the trial reported improved perception of low-level sounds with compression, although a few disliked the increased loudness of some background noises. Some participants suggested that the ability to enable or disable compression with a manual switch would be helpful. Overall, the results show that input compression can improve the performance of these sound processors for users of cochlear implants, especially when listening to speech at low levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11833989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  6 in total

Review 1.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

2.  Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cochlear implant characteristics and speech perception skills of adolescents with long-term device use.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Christine Brenner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  The effect of automatic gain control structure and release time on cochlear implant speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Phyu P Khing; Brett A Swanson; Eliathamby Ambikairajah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Clinical evaluation of the Nucleus 6 cochlear implant system: performance improvements with SmartSound iQ.

Authors:  Stefan J Mauger; Chris D Warren; Michelle R Knight; Michael Goorevich; Esti Nel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Real-time loudness normalisation with combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.

Authors:  Dimitar Spirrov; Maaike Van Eeckhoutte; Lieselot Van Deun; Tom Francart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.