Literature DB >> 11832721

Multi-institutional experience with buccal mucosa onlay urethroplasty for bulbar urethral reconstruction.

Christopher J Kane1, Gregory J Tarman, Duncan J Summerton, Craig E Buchmann, John F Ward, Keith J O'Reilly, Henry Ruiz, J Brantley Thrasher, Burk Zorn, Carolyn Smith, Allen F Morey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Buccal mucosa has been advocated as an ideal graft material for urethral reconstruction. We report our multicenter experience with buccal mucosa ventral onlay urethroplasty for complex bulbar urethral reconstruction in adults.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone buccal onlay urethroplasty at 4 military medical treatment facilities participating in the Uniformed Services Urology Research Group was performed. The database generated included demographic data, genitourinary history, preoperative symptoms (American Urological Association symptom score), preoperative urinary flow rate, stricture length and operative statistics. Postoperative followup data included symptom score, flow rate, retrograde urethrogram results, and complications.
RESULTS: A total of 53 patients (average age 32 years, range 17 to 64) underwent buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty between January, 1996 and March, 1998 for refractory strictures. Sixteen patients had undergone an average of 2.2 prior endoscopic procedures (range 1 to 7). Average stricture length was 3.6 plus or minus standard deviation 1.8 cm. (range 2 to 7.5) as measured on preoperative retrograde urethrogram. Followup averaged 25 months (range 11 to 40 months). Average symptom scores decreased from 21.2 (range 14 to 33) preoperatively to 5.4 (range 3 to 8) postoperatively (p <0.001). Average peak urinary flow rates increased from 7.9 preoperatively to 30.1 ml. per second postoperatively (p <0.001). Postoperative retrograde urethrograms were available for 34 patients and were normal in 24. The overall complication rate was 5.4%. Three patients required endoscopic incisions. One patient has a recurrent narrowing and treatment is considered a failure. There were 4 sacculations (7.5%) and 6 narrowings, 3 of which required further treatment. Of the patients 50 required no additional procedures (94.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Buccal mucosa grafts used as a ventral onlay for bulbar urethral reconstruction yield reproducibly excellent results with minimal morbidity and low complication rates. Longer followup will be required to confirm the durability of our results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11832721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  29 in total

Review 1.  A simplified and unified approach to anterior urethroplasty.

Authors:  W Britt Zimmerman; Richard A Santucci
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  [Urethral reconstructive surgery].

Authors:  S Hauser; G Fechner; J Ellinger; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Oral mucosa for reconstructive urethral surgery].

Authors:  R Mayr; A Pycha
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Primary dorsal buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures in patients with lichen sclerosus.

Authors:  Miodrag Acimovic; Bogomir Milojevic; Marko Milosavljevic; Marta Skrodzka; Milan Radovanovic; Dragutin Rafailovic; Zoran Dzamic; Jovan Hadzi Djokic; Rados Djinovic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Management of the Recurrent Male Urethral Stricture.

Authors:  Uwais B Zaid; Garjae Lavien; Andrew C Peterson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Is anastomotic urethroplasty is really superior than BMG augmented dorsal onlay urethroplasty in terms of outcomes and patient satisfaction: Our 4-year experience.

Authors:  Anil Kumar Choudhary; Nawal K Jha
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Impact of graft position on failure of single-stage bulbar urethroplasties with buccal mucosa graft.

Authors:  Bradley D Figler; Bahaa S Malaeb; Geolani W Dy; Bryan B Voelzke; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Primary non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty long-term success rates are similar to transecting urethroplasty.

Authors:  Kirk M Anderson; Stephen A Blakely; Colin I O'Donnell; Dmitriy Nikolavsky; Brian J Flynn
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  One-stage urethral reconstruction using colonic mucosa graft: an experimental and clinical study.

Authors:  Yue-Min Xu; Yong Qiao; Ying-Long Sa; Jiong Zhang; Hui-Zhen Zhang; Xin-Ru Zhang; Deng-Long Wu; Rong Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Buccal mucosa urethroplasty: a 10-year retrospective review of maxillofacial and urological outcomes.

Authors:  J E O'Connell; I M Cullen; C Murphy; H Flood; G J Kearns
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.