Literature DB >> 1183067

A cytogenetic survey of 14,069 newborn infants. I. Incidence of chromosome abnormalities.

J L Hamerton, N Canning, M Ray, S Smith.   

Abstract

Data from a chromosome examination of 14,069 consecutive newborn infants is presented. Successful karyotypes were obtained on 13,939 babies using short-term blood cultures and conventional staining methods. Of those, 13,645 babies had normal chromosomes; 64 (0.46%) had a major chromosome abnormality; and 230 (1.65%) had a marker chromosome; giving a total of 294 (2.11%) babies with a major chromosome abnormality or distinctive marker chromosomes. Six male babies with sex chromosome abnormalities had a 47,XXY and four a 47,XYY karyotype, and three were mixoploids. Five female babies had a 47,XXX karytotype and two were mixoploids. There were three babies with ambiguous external genitalia, all with normal karyotypes. Fourteen babies had 21-trisomy; there were three 18-trisomics and one 13-trisomic. The mother of one 18-trisomy baby had a balanced (18;21) translocation. Twenty-four infants had a balanced chromosome rearrangement. Eleven of these were reciprocal and thirteen were Robertsonian translocations. One baby had an unbalanced derivative chromosome resulting from an 18;11 insertion. Two infants with additional unidentified fragments were detected. Two hundred and thirty babies (1:60) carying distinctive chromosome variants were detected. The commonest variant was the Yq+ among males (0.89%). Other common variants involved the short arms of the D and G groups (0.32% and 0.57%, respectively) 16q+ (0.09%), and 1q+ (0.04%). The results of the present study when combined with five other comparable studies, thus comprising a total of 46,150 newborn infants, indicates that the frequency of major chromosome abnormalities is between 1:150 and 1:200 live-born babies. This represents a small proportion of all conceptuses with chromosome abnormalities, which has been estimated as being approximately 1:20. It is thus clear that chromosome abnormalities form a major part of the genetic load carried by the human population. The development of chromosome banding techniques already has increased, and with further increase, the complexities of human cytogenetics and may reveal many additional rearrangements undetectable by conventional methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1183067     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1975.tb01498.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  141 in total

1.  Identification and characterization of satellite III subfamilies to the acrocentric chromosomes.

Authors:  R Bandyopadhyay; C McQuillan; S L Page; K H Choo; L G Shaffer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  International variation in reported livebirth prevalence rates of Down syndrome, adjusted for maternal age.

Authors:  A D Carothers; C A Hecht; E B Hook
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 3.  Parental origin and timing of de novo Robertsonian translocation formation.

Authors:  Ruma Bandyopadhyay; Anita Heller; Cami Knox-DuBois; Christopher McCaskill; Sue Ann Berend; Scott L Page; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  46 XY gonadal dysgenesis in adulthood 'pitfalls of late diagnosis'.

Authors:  Jarna Naing Hamin; Francis Raymond P Arkoncel; Frances Lina Lantion-Ang; Mark Anthony S Sandoval
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-02-10

5.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in female and male carriers of reciprocal translocations: clinical outcome until delivery of 312 cycles.

Authors:  Kathelijn Keymolen; Catherine Staessen; Willem Verpoest; Inge Liebaers; Maryse Bonduelle
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Molecular analysis of nondisjunction in mice heterozygous for a Robertsonian translocation.

Authors:  Lara A Underkoffler; Laura E Mitchell; A Russell Localio; Shannon M Marchegiani; Justin Morabito; Joelle N Collins; Rebecca J Oakey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Early assessment of ambiguous genitalia.

Authors:  A L Ogilvy-Stuart; C E Brain
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  C-Band polymorphisms of chromosomes 1, 9, and 16 in four subgroups of mentally retarded patients and a normal control population.

Authors:  H S Wang; J L Hamerton
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1979-10-02       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Cytogenetic studies in a population suspected to have chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  V C Shah; D S Murthy; S K Murthy
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 10.  Pericentric inversions. Problems and significance for clinical genetics.

Authors:  P Kaiser
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.