Literature DB >> 11829446

Effects on antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus epidermidis following adhesion to polymethylmethacrylate and to silicone surfaces.

Carla Renata Arciola1, Davide Campoccia, Lucio Montanaro.   

Abstract

A number of studies appears to give emphasis to the role of prosthetic materials in determining microbial adherence and resistance to host defence and drug therapy. Aim of this study was to explore whether the direct contact with biomaterial substrata of different chemical nature could influence bacterial behaviour, determining possible changes in the bacteria population as far as antibiotic resistance is concerned. To this end, susceptibility to penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, cefamandole, imipenem, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin. ampicillin, cefazolin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, amikacin and netilmicin was evaluated in a methicillin-, gentamicin- and tobramycin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain, after in vitro adhesion to polymethylmethacrylate (PM MA) and to silicone elastomer. The susceptibility to antibiotics of both adherent bacteria and bacteria which, although exposed to the materials, had not undergone adhesion was measured as bacterial growth inhibition area onto a plate antibiogram. according to Kirby-Bauer and using an image analyser system. The results obtained suggest that the two test materials considered in this study were capable to condition bacterial behaviour. In particular. the adhesion onto PMMA surfaces induced a marked and significant decrease in susceptibility to the following beta-lactam antibiotics: cefamandole (32%), cefazolin (23%), imipenem (27%), ampicillin (31%). Moreover, PMMA caused a lower but significant reduction in resistance to vancomycin (15%), chloramphenicol (16%), amikacin (13%). netilmicin (13%), erythromycin (11%) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (13%). In contrast, the adhesion onto silicone elastomer appeared to influence bacterial changes to a lesser extent and elicited a significant decrease in susceptibility only to cefazolin (10%) and amikacin (11). Further studies are required to thoroughly investigate the mechanisms of these variations, even though, also according to other authors, one of the best conceivable conclusions is that some material substrata can lead to selection of variant adhesive bacteria with increased antibiotic resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11829446     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00275-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  15 in total

1.  The relationship between inhibition of bacterial adhesion to a solid surface by sub-MICs of antibiotics and subsequent development of a biofilm.

Authors:  Nuno Cerca; Silvia Martins; Gerald B Pier; Rosário Oliveira; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 3.992

2.  Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTT colorimetry.

Authors:  Nuno Cerca; Silvia Martins; Filipe Cerca; Kimberly K Jefferson; Gerald B Pier; Rosário Oliveira; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Prophylactic use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total knee replacement.

Authors:  Pietro Randelli; Francesco R Evola; Paolo Cabitza; Luca Polli; Matteo Denti; Luca Vaienti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Antibiotic-loaded Bone Cement as Prophylaxis in Total Joint Replacement.

Authors:  Javier Martínez-Moreno; Virginia Merino; Amparo Nácher; José Luis Rodrigo; Mónica Climente; Matilde Merino-Sanjuán
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Effects of growth in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of dicloxacillin on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus biofilms.

Authors:  Nuno Cerca; Silvia Martins; Sanna Sillankorva; Kimberly K Jefferson; Gerald B Pier; Rosario Oliveira; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  A simplified biomolecule attachment strategy for biosensing using a porous Si oxide interferometer.

Authors:  Loren A Perelman; Michael P Schwartz; Aaron M Wohlrab; Michael S Vannieuwenhze; Michael J Sailor
Journal:  Physica Status Solidi A Appl Res       Date:  2007-05

Review 7.  Microbial resistance related to antibiotic-loaded bone cement: a historical review.

Authors:  Lucy C Walker; Paul Baker; Richard Holleyman; David Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparison of the selection of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli during enrofloxacin administration with a local drug delivery system or with intramuscular injections in a swine model.

Authors:  Romain Béraud; Louis Huneault; Dave Bernier; Francis Beaudry; Ann Letellier; Jérôme R E del Castillo
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.310

9.  Confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of S. epidermidis biofilms exposed to farnesol, vancomycin and rifampicin.

Authors:  Nuno Cerca; Fernanda Gomes; Sofia Pereira; Pilar Teixeira; Rosário Oliveira
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-05-16

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement use in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jiaxing Wang; Chen Zhu; Tao Cheng; Xiaochun Peng; Wen Zhang; Hui Qin; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.