BACKGROUND: Despite increasing attention to end-of-life care in oncology, palliative surgery (PS) remains poorly defined. A survey to test the definition, assess the extent of use, and evaluate attitudes and goals of surgeons regarding PS was devised. METHODS: A survey of Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) members. RESULTS: 419 SSO members completed a 110-item survey. Surgeons estimated 21% of their cancer surgeries as palliative in nature. Forty-three percent of respondents felt PS was best defined based on pre-operative intent, 27% based on post-operative factors, and 30% on patient prognosis. Only 43% considered estimated patient survival time an important factor in defining PS, and 22% considered 5-year survival rate important. The vast majority (95%) considered tumor still evident following surgery in a patient with poor prognosis constituted PS. Most surgeons felt PS could be procedures due to generalized illness related to cancer (80%) or related to cancer treatment complications (76%). Patient symptom relief and pain relief were identified as the two most important goals in PS, with increased survival the least important. CONCLUSION: PS is a major portion of surgical oncology practice. Quality-of-life parameters, not patient survival, were identified as the most important goals of PS.
BACKGROUND: Despite increasing attention to end-of-life care in oncology, palliative surgery (PS) remains poorly defined. A survey to test the definition, assess the extent of use, and evaluate attitudes and goals of surgeons regarding PS was devised. METHODS: A survey of Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) members. RESULTS: 419 SSO members completed a 110-item survey. Surgeons estimated 21% of their cancer surgeries as palliative in nature. Forty-three percent of respondents felt PS was best defined based on pre-operative intent, 27% based on post-operative factors, and 30% on patient prognosis. Only 43% considered estimated patient survival time an important factor in defining PS, and 22% considered 5-year survival rate important. The vast majority (95%) considered tumor still evident following surgery in a patient with poor prognosis constituted PS. Most surgeons felt PS could be procedures due to generalized illness related to cancer (80%) or related to cancer treatment complications (76%). Patient symptom relief and pain relief were identified as the two most important goals in PS, with increased survival the least important. CONCLUSION: PS is a major portion of surgical oncology practice. Quality-of-life parameters, not patient survival, were identified as the most important goals of PS.
Authors: Katherine C Lee; Anne M Walling; Steven S Senglaub; Amy S Kelley; Zara Cooper Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Mary Morrogh; Thomas J Miner; Anna Park; Ann Jenckes; Mithat Gonen; Andrew Seidman; Monica Morrow; David P Jaques; Tari A King Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Brian D Badgwell; Kerrington Smith; Ping Liu; Eduardo Bruera; Steven A Curley; Janice N Cormier Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-12-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Pasithorn A Suwanabol; Ari C Reichstein; Z Tuba Suzer-Gurtekin; Jane Forman; Maria J Silveira; Lona Mody; Arden M Morris Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 2.947