BACKGROUND: Methods for gene transfer to the cornea that yield high-level expression without inflammation or trauma are currently lacking. Because electroporation has proven effective for gene transfer in other tissues in terms of expression levels and safety, this study quantitatively evaluated its use in the cornea. METHODS: To evaluate the use of electroporation in the mouse cornea, plasmids expressing either luciferase or green fluorescent protein were injected intracorneally or subconjunctivally and square-wave electric pulses were immediately applied to the eyes. Gene expression was quantified at later times and trauma and inflammation were monitored visually and by measuring interleukin-6 (IL-6) production. RESULTS: The application of electric pulses to eyes injected with plasmid resulted in nanogram levels of gene product expression. At an optimal field strength of 200 V/cm, no trauma, corneal edema or inflammation was observed. However, at higher field strengths, corneal damage was detected. Compared with injection of DNA alone, up to 1000-fold more gene product was produced using electroporation. Expression was detected as early as 6 h post-electroporation, remained high for 3 days, and decreased by 7 days. Gene expression was detected over the entire surface of the cornea in both epithelial and stromal layers. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that electroporation is an excellent method for delivering genes to multiple cell layers within the mouse cornea and that it results in extremely high levels of gene expression with little, if any, inflammatory response or tissue damage, making this a very useful technique for corneal gene transfer. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Methods for gene transfer to the cornea that yield high-level expression without inflammation or trauma are currently lacking. Because electroporation has proven effective for gene transfer in other tissues in terms of expression levels and safety, this study quantitatively evaluated its use in the cornea. METHODS: To evaluate the use of electroporation in the mouse cornea, plasmids expressing either luciferase or green fluorescent protein were injected intracorneally or subconjunctivally and square-wave electric pulses were immediately applied to the eyes. Gene expression was quantified at later times and trauma and inflammation were monitored visually and by measuring interleukin-6 (IL-6) production. RESULTS: The application of electric pulses to eyes injected with plasmid resulted in nanogram levels of gene product expression. At an optimal field strength of 200 V/cm, no trauma, corneal edema or inflammation was observed. However, at higher field strengths, corneal damage was detected. Compared with injection of DNA alone, up to 1000-fold more gene product was produced using electroporation. Expression was detected as early as 6 h post-electroporation, remained high for 3 days, and decreased by 7 days. Gene expression was detected over the entire surface of the cornea in both epithelial and stromal layers. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that electroporation is an excellent method for delivering genes to multiple cell layers within the mouse cornea and that it results in extremely high levels of gene expression with little, if any, inflammatory response or tissue damage, making this a very useful technique for corneal gene transfer. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: N S Yew; D M Wysokenski; K X Wang; R J Ziegler; J Marshall; D McNeilly; M Cherry; W Osburn; S H Cheng Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 1997-03-20 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: L M Mir; M F Bureau; J Gehl; R Rangara; D Rouy; J M Caillaud; P Delaere; D Branellec; B Schwartz; D Scherman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-04-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: H B Oral; D F Larkin; Z Fehervari; A P Byrnes; A M Rankin; D O Haskard; M J Wood; M J Dallman; A J George Journal: Gene Ther Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: B Seitz; E Baktanian; E M Gordon; W F Anderson; L LaBree; P J McDonnell Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Elizabeth A Nunamaker; Hai-Ying Zhang; Yuichi Shirasawa; Joseph N Benoit; David A Dean Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2003-07-24 Impact factor: 4.733