Literature DB >> 11828358

Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Michael A Diefenbach1, Jenevie Dorsey, Robert G Uzzo, Gerald E Hanks, Richard E Greenberg, Eric Horwitz, Fredrick Newton, Paul F Engstrom.   

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer not only have to cope with the impact of the cancer diagnosis, but also need to interpret complicated medical information to make an informed treatment decision. We report initial results from an ongoing longitudinal investigation examining treatment decision making among men diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer. Men (N = 654) were recruited into the assessment study after an initial treatment consultation with a urologic surgeon or radiation oncologist. Patients were, on average, 66 years old, married (85%), had at least a high school education (45%), were retired (58%), and were Caucasian (91%) or African American (7%). Guided by a cognitive-affective theoretical framework, we assessed treatment and disease-relevant beliefs and affects in addition to clinical variables. The majority of patients decided on external beam radiation therapy (52%), followed by brachytherapy (25%), prostatectomy (17%), and watchful waiting (6%). Patients who decided on prostatectomy were significantly younger (mean age, 58 yr) than patients who received radiation therapy (mean age, 67 yr) and brachytherapy (mean age, 66 yr). When asked for the most important reason influencing their treatment decision, patients indicated physician recommendation (51%), advice from friends and family (19%), information obtained from books and journals (18%), or the Internet (7%). Among cognitive variables, patients who decided on surgery perceived prostate cancer as being significantly more serious (P <.001), and had greater difficulties in making a treatment decision (P <.005) compared with patients receiving radiation therapy or brachytherapy. Surgical patients were also more distressed about their treatment decision (P <.001) and concerned that the cancer might spread (P <.005). To date, patients followed-up after treatment have not indicated significant regrets about their therapeutic choice. These data suggest that unique treatment-related beliefs and affects need to be taken into account during the treatment counseling process. Implications for the development of decision aids are discussed. Copyright 2002 by W.B. Saunders Company

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11828358     DOI: 10.1053/suro.2002.30399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1081-0943


  36 in total

1.  Race/ethnicity and the receipt of watchful waiting for the initial management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Martin L Brown; Arnold L Potosky; Carrie N Klabunde; W W Davis; Judd W Moul; Angela Fahey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Age differences in dual information-processing modes: implications for cancer decision making.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Michael A Diefenbach; Thomas M Hess; Daniel Västfjäll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  The decision-related psychosocial concerns of men with localised prostate cancer: targets for intervention and research.

Authors:  Suzanne K Steginga; Emma Turner; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Prostate cancer. Socioeconomic status and disparities in treatment patterns.

Authors:  David I Chu; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Implications of the Fracture Risk Assessment Algorithm for the assessment and improvement of bone health in patients with prostate cancer: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ashish Sharma; Rahul Janak Sinha; Vishwajeet Singh; Gaurav Garg; Samarth Agarwal; Siddharth Pandey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-02-20

6.  Factors influencing patients' acceptance and adherence to active surveillance.

Authors:  David F Penson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

7.  Association of Preexisting Symptoms with Treatment Decisions among Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Scott D Ramsey; Arnold L Potosky; Neeraj K Arora; David K Blough; Ingrid Oakley-Girvan; Ann S Hamilton; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; David F Penson
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Localized prostate cancer treatment decision-making information online: improving its effectiveness and dissemination for nonprofit and government-supported organizations.

Authors:  Kami J Silk; Evan K Perrault; Samantha Nazione; Kristin Pace; Polly Hager; Steven Springer
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  [Elderly prostate cancer patients: patient information and shared decision making].

Authors:  N Ernstmann; J Jaeger; C Kowalski; H Pfaff; L Weißbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Emotional Distress Increases the Likelihood of Undergoing Surgery among Men with Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Willie Underwood; Caitlin Biddle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.