Literature DB >> 11826940

The Ontario Family Medicine Residents Cohort Study: factors affecting residents' decisions to practise obstetrics.

Marshall Godwin1, Geoffrey Hodgetts, Rachelle Seguin, Susan MacDonald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of family physicians practising obstetrics in Canada is declining. On the assumption that factors related to the obstetrics training of family medicine residents may be influencing this trend, we conducted a cohort study of residents' stated intentions with regard to practising obstetrics, their educational experiences and their subsequent obstetric practice.
METHODS: We followed a cohort consisting of all residents who enrolled in family medicine residency programs in Ontario in 1994 and 1995. The data, collected by mail-in survey at entry to, during and 2 years after completion of the 2-year training programs, consisted of residents' characteristics, stated plans during residency to practise obstetrics, obstetric experiences during training, attitudes and opinions related to obstetrics, and actual practice 2 years after completion of residency. We used logistic regression to determine the factors influencing whether a family physician practises obstetrics after graduation.
RESULTS: Of the 498 residents who started programs in 1994 and 1995, 480 were eligible for inclusion, although not all of those eligible responded to the various surveys. At entry into the residency programs, 216 (52%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 47-57%) of the 411 respondents expressed an intention to practise obstetrics. By the end of residency, the proportion intending to practise obstetrics had fallen to 17% (95% CI 13-22%; 46 of 274 respondents), and only 16% (95% CI 12% to 20%) were actually practising intrapartum obstetrics (i.e., delivering babies) 2 years later. The proportions of residents in the 7 Ontario family medicine programs who were actually practising obstetrics 2 years later ranged from 2% of those from the University of Western Ontario to 38% of those from Thunder Bay. Three factors were independently associated with practising intrapartum obstetrics 2 years after completing residency: intention at the end of residency to practise intrapartum obstetrics (odds ratio [OR] 11.7, 95% CI 3.1-44.7, p = 0.001), not having the opinion that intrapartum care is too disruptive of personal life (OR 9.1, 95% CI 1.5-55.5, p = 0.02) and practising in a community of 15 000 or fewer people (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.8-19.4, p = 0.003).
INTERPRETATION: Residents who have positive attitudes toward obstetrics at the end of their training and who intend at that time to perform deliveries are more likely to be doing so 2 years later, especially if they practise in communities of 15,000 or fewer people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11826940      PMCID: PMC99270     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  14 in total

1.  Who Will Deliver Canada's Babies in the 1990s?

Authors:  W W Rosser; H Muggah
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Choosing to Practise Obstetrics: What factors influence family practice residents?

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Practice choices of graduating family medicine residents.

Authors:  M Godwin; G Hodgetts; R Wilson; R Pong; E Najgebauer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Closed and restricted practices.

Authors:  C A Woodward; A P Williams; M Cohen; B Ferrier
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M A Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Obstetrical practice after a family medicine residency.

Authors:  D Buckle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Family physicians in maternity care. Still in the game? Report from the CFPC's Janus Project.

Authors:  A J Reid; I Grava-Gubins; J C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M Klein; I Lloyd; C Redman; M Bull; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-02

9.  A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. II. Labour and delivery management and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M Klein; I Lloyd; C Redman; M Bull; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-02

10.  A comparison of family physicians' and obstetricians' intrapartum management of low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  S E MacDonald; K Voaklander; R V Birtwhistle
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  11 in total

1.  Obstetrics in family medicine.

Authors:  Jim Ruderman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-07-09       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Mix of Maternity Care Providers in Canada.

Authors:  Harminder Guliani
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-08

3.  Short report: Ontario family medicine residents. Practice choices in 1998 and 1999.

Authors:  Marshall Godwin; Geoffrey Hodgetts; Susan MacDonald; Rachelle Seguin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Duty to deliver: producing more family medicine graduates who practise obstetrics.

Authors:  Susan MacDonald
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Change in Oregon maternity care workforce after malpractice premium subsidy implementation.

Authors:  Ariel K Smits; Valerie J King; Rebecca E Rdesinski; Lisa G Dodson; John W Saultz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Effect of a collaborative interdisciplinary maternity care program on perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Susan J Harris; Patricia A Janssen; Lee Saxell; Elaine A Carty; George S MacRae; Karen L Petersen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Rural intentions: factors affecting the career choices of family medicine graduates.

Authors:  Diane J Lu; Jacquie Hakes; Meera Bai; Helen Tolhurst; James A Dickinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  What influences success in family medicine maternity care education programs? Qualitative exploration.

Authors:  Anne Biringer; Milena Forte; Anastasia Tobin; Elizabeth Shaw; David Tannenbaum
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Does the presence of learners affect family medicine obstetric outcomes?

Authors:  Jo-Anne Hammond
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Enhanced skills training in family medicine maternity care: Cross-sectional study of graduates' experiences.

Authors:  Anne Biringer; Dara Abells; Jordana Boro; Joanne A Permaul; Sucheta Sinha; Lisa Graves
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.