| Literature DB >> 11825604 |
Nancy Kelley-Loughnane1, Susan A Biolsi, Kate M Gibson, Guqiang Lu, Michael J Hehir, Paul Phelan, Evan R Kantrowitz.
Abstract
Previous kinetic characterization of Escherichia coli fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase) was performed on enzyme with an estimated purity of only 50%. Contradictory kinetic properties of the partially purified E. coli FBPase have been reported in regard to AMP cooperativity and inactivation by fructose-2,6-bisphosphate. In this investigation, a new purification for E. coli FBPase has been devised yielding enzyme with purity levels as high as 98%. This highly purified E. coli FBPase was characterized and the data compared to that for the pig kidney enzyme. Also, a homology model was created based upon the known three-dimensional structure of the pig kidney enzyme. The kcat of the E. coli FBPase was 14.6 s(-1) as compared to 21 s(-1) for the pig kidney enzyme, while the K(m) of the E. coli enzyme was approximately 10-fold higher than that of the pig kidney enzyme. The concentration of Mg2+ required to bring E. coli FBPase to half maximal activity was estimated to be 0.62 mM Mg2+, which is twice that required for the pig kidney enzyme. Unlike the pig kidney enzyme, the Mg2+ activation of the E. coli FBPase is not cooperative. AMP inhibition of mammalian FBPases is cooperative with a Hill coefficient of 2; however, the E. coli FBPase displays no cooperativity. Although cooperativity is not observed, the E. coli and pig kidney enzymes show similar AMP affinity. The quaternary structure of the E. coli enzyme is tetrameric, although higher molecular mass aggregates were also observed. The homology model of the E. coli enzyme indicated slight variations in the ligand-binding pockets compared to the pig kidney enzyme. The homology model of the E. coli enzyme also identified significant changes in the interfaces between the subunits, indicating possible changes in the path of communication of the allosteric signal.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2002 PMID: 11825604 DOI: 10.1016/s0167-4838(01)00261-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta ISSN: 0006-3002