Literature DB >> 11825237

Developing a taxonomy for research in adverse drug events: potholes and signposts.

J R Nebeker1, J F Hurdle, J Hoffman, B Roth, C R Weir, M H Samore.   

Abstract

Computerized decision support and order entry shows great promise for reducing adverse drug events (ADEs). The evaluation of these solutions depends on a framework of definitions and classifications that is clear and practical. Unfortunately the literature does not always provide a clear path to defining and classifying adverse drug events. While not a systematic review, this paper uses examples from the literature to illustrate problems that investigators will confront as they develop a conceptual framework for their research. It also proposes a targeted taxonomy that can facilitate a clear and consistent approach to the research of ADEs and aid in the comparison to results of past and future studies. The taxonomy addresses the definition of ADE, types, seriousness, error, and causality.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11825237      PMCID: PMC2243589     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  11 in total

1.  Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  I R Edwards; J K Aronson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-07       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in nursing homes.

Authors:  J H Gurwitz; T S Field; J Avorn; D McCormick; S Jain; M Eckler; M Benser; A C Edmondson; D W Bates
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Evaluating the potential effectiveness of using computerized information systems to prevent adverse drug events.

Authors:  J G Anderson; S J Jay; M Anderson; T J Hunt
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

4.  Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  D W Bates; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; S D Small; D Servi; G Laffel; B J Sweitzer; B F Shea; R Hallisey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Introducing MEDWatch. A new approach to reporting medication and device adverse effects and product problems.

Authors:  D A Kessler
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.238

6.  Comparison of two recently published algorithms for assessing the probability of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  U Busto; C A Naranjo; E M Sellers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention.

Authors:  D W Bates; J M Teich; J Lee; D Seger; G J Kuperman; N Ma'Luf; D Boyle; L Leape
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality.

Authors:  D C Classen; S L Pestotnik; R S Evans; J F Lloyd; J P Burke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients.

Authors:  D C Classen; S L Pestotnik; R S Evans; J P Burke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Medication error prevention by clinical pharmacists in two children's hospitals.

Authors:  H L Folli; R L Poole; W E Benitz; J C Russo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  5 in total

1.  Interventions to reduce medication prescribing errors in a paediatric cardiac intensive care unit.

Authors:  Margarita K Burmester; Roger Dionne; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Peter C Laussen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  A new approach to identify, classify and count drug-related events.

Authors:  Thomas Bürkle; Fabian Müller; Andrius Patapovas; Anja Sonst; Barbara Pfistermeister; Bettina Plank-Kiegele; Harald Dormann; Renke Maas
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Using nurses and office staff to report prescribing errors in primary care.

Authors:  Amanda G Kennedy; Benjamin Littenberg; John W Senders
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Effectiveness of pharmacist dosing adjustment for critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: a comparative study.

Authors:  Sai-Ping Jiang; Zheng-Yi Zhu; Xiao-Liang Wu; Xiao-Yang Lu; Xing-Guo Zhang; Bao-Hua Wu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Medication errors involving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: results from the 2005-2015 MEDMARX database.

Authors:  Maitreyee Mohanty; Oluwadolapo D Lawal; Margie Skeer; Ryan Lanier; Nathalie Erpelding; Nathaniel Katz
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2018-04-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.