Literature DB >> 11824193

Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing.

W H Guilford1.   

Abstract

Many undergraduate and graduate students understand neither the process of scientific writing nor the significance of peer review. In response, some instructors have created writing assignments that teach or mimic parts of the scientific publishing process. However, none fully reproduced peer review and revision of papers together with the writing and publishing process from research to final, accepted draft. In addition, most have been instituted at the graduate rather than undergraduate level. We present a detailed method for teaching undergraduate students the full scientific publishing process, including anonymous peer review, during the process of writing a "term paper." The result is a review article in the format for submission to a major scientific journal. This method has been implemented in the course Cell and Molecular Biology for Engineers at the University of Virginia. Use of this method resulted in improved grades, much higher quality in the final manuscript, greater objectivity in grading, and improved understanding of the importance of peer review.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11824193     DOI: 10.1152/advances.2001.25.3.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  16 in total

1.  Inquiry learning. Integrating content detail and critical reasoning by peer review.

Authors:  Ravi Iyengar; Maria A Diverse-Pierluissi; Sherry L Jenkins; Andrew M Chan; Lakshmi A Devi; Eric A Sobie; Adrian T Ting; Daniel C Weinstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The skill of writing.

Authors:  Bryan S Judge
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-03

3.  The Use of Mock NSF-type Grant Proposals and Blind Peer Review as the Capstone Assignment in Upper-Level Neurobiology and Cell Biology Courses.

Authors:  Haruhiko Itagaki
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2013-10-15

4.  Isolation and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants defective in chromosome transmission in an undergraduate genetics research course.

Authors:  Heidi Major Sleister
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Medical theses as part of the scientific training in basic medical and dental education: experiences from Finland.

Authors:  Pentti Nieminen; Kirsi Sipilä; Hanna-Mari Takkinen; Marjo Renko; Leila Risteli
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Authentic Research Experience and "Big Data" Analysis in the Classroom: Maize Response to Abiotic Stress.

Authors:  Irina Makarevitch; Cameo Frechette; Natalia Wiatros
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  The Benefits of Peer Review and a Multisemester Capstone Writing Series on Inquiry and Analysis Skills in an Undergraduate Thesis.

Authors:  K F Weaver; V Morales; M Nelson; P F Weaver; A Toledo; K Godde
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  An undergraduate course on publishing in neuroscience.

Authors:  Leslie Sargent Jones; L Codi Black; Lauren Bright; Catherine Meekins; Vivek Thakur; Cade Warren
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2006-06-15

9.  Do Students Eventually Get to Publish their Research Findings? The Case of Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research in Cameroon.

Authors:  Ns Munung; L Vidal; O Ouwe-Missi-Oukem-Boyer
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-05

10.  Teaching cross-cultural design thinking for healthcare.

Authors:  Mafalda Falcão Ferreira; Julia N Savoy; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.