Literature DB >> 11822792

A longitudinal study of health related quality of life and utility measures in patients with advanced breast cancer.

D J Perez1, S M Williams, E A Christensen, R O McGee, A V Campbell.   

Abstract

Health related quality of life (HRQOL) measures are now accepted as indicators of efficacy in the palliative treatment of cancer. Utility measures may also provide valuable information yet they have been applied less frequently. To assess the application of a time trade-off (TTO) utility measure and its concordance with the Spitzer uniscale and quality of life index (QLI) 38 women with advanced, symptomatic breast cancer were studied over a 12 month period. The correlation coefficient for QLI and TTO values was 0.54 and for uniscale and TTO 0.62. Using generalized estimating equations the regression of TTO scores on QLI and uniscale scores was significant at baseline. In longitudinal analyses results were significant only for QLI. Although all participants completed the HRQOL measures only 24 (63%) were prepared to trade time. The remaining 14 (32%) stated they felt too well to trade. Those prepared to trade time recorded significantly worse mean HRQOL scores throughout the study compared to those who felt too well to trade and had tumors which showed a poorer response to therapy. In this preliminary study utility and HRQOL scores were generally favorable throughout the 12 month study period and showed fair to moderate concordance. Further research in larger patient groups is required to better define the relationships between utility and HRQOL measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11822792     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013193007095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  20 in total

1.  Functional status versus utilities in survivors of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Tsevat; L Goldman; G A Lamas; M A Pfeffer; C C Chapin; K F Connors; T H Lee
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Positive and negative psychosocial sequelae of bone marrow transplantation: implications for quality of life assessment.

Authors:  K Fromm; M A Andrykowski; J Hunt
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1996-06

3.  The use of generic and specific quality-of-life measures in hemodialysis patients treated with erythropoietin. The Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group.

Authors:  A Laupacis; C Wong; D Churchill
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1991-08

Review 4.  Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D A Revicki; R M Kaplan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2--Correlation between subjects.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-11

8.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians.

Authors:  W O Spitzer; A J Dobson; J Hall; E Chesterman; J Levi; R Shepherd; R N Battista; B R Catchlove
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1981

9.  A comparison of time trade-off and quality of life measures in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  D J Perez; R McGee; A V Campbell; E A Christensen; S Williams
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Psychosocial status in chronic illness. A comparative analysis of six diagnostic groups.

Authors:  B R Cassileth; E J Lusk; T B Strouse; D S Miller; L L Brown; P A Cross; A N Tenaglia
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Quality-of-life valuations of advanced breast cancer by New Zealand women.

Authors:  Richard J Milne; Kathy H Heaton-Brown; Paul Hansen; David Thomas; Vernon Harvey; Alison Cubitt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Rapid magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing cancer-related low back pain.

Authors:  William Hollingworth; Darryl T Gray; Brook I Martin; Sean D Sullivan; Richard A Deyo; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Health related quality of life in different states of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mathias Lidgren; Nils Wilking; Bengt Jönsson; Clas Rehnberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Using individual growth model to analyze the change in quality of life from adolescence to adulthood.

Authors:  Henian Chen; Patricia Cohen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 5.  Many quality measurements, but few quality measures assessing the quality of breast cancer care in women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Howard M Schachter; Vasil Mamaladze; Gabriela Lewin; Ian D Graham; Melissa Brouwers; Margaret Sampson; Andra Morrison; Li Zhang; Peter O'Blenis; Chantelle Garritty
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A Lloyd; B Nafees; J Narewska; S Dewilde; J Watkins
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Quality of life versus length of life considerations in cancer patients: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Anne Shrestha; Charlene Martin; Maria Burton; Stephen Walters; Karen Collins; Lynda Wyld
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 8.  Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.