Literature DB >> 11822259

Developing a model to enhance the capacity of statutory organisations to engage with lay communities.

Christine Pickin1, Jennie Popay, Kristina Staley, Nigel Bruce, Christopher Jones, Natasha Gowman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand the processes that constrain the capacity of statutory organisations to work effectively with lay communities and to develop a model to enhance their capacity to do so.
METHODS: The research consisted of three elements: a review of relevant literature; in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of people who had recently been involved in community-statutory sector partnership; and a deliberative workshop involving ten expert witnesses, selected to reflect a range of sectors and levels within organisations.
RESULTS: Many factors contribute to a lack of effective strategic partnerships between lay communities and statutory organisations. These factors fall into five domains: the community's capacity to engage; the skills and competencies of organisational staff; the dominant professional service culture; the overall organisational ethos and culture; and the dynamics of the local and national political systems. A model of the relationships and/or interaction between these domains is postulated. There is potential for testing this model with statutory organisations to see whether it concurs with their reality and whether it is enhancing their organisational capacity.
CONCLUSIONS: Commonly occurring constraints to effective partnerships between statutory organisations and lay communities need to be identified and addressed by applying a dynamic model of the type presented here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11822259     DOI: 10.1258/1355819021927656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  11 in total

1.  Grounded citizens' juries: a tool for health activism?

Authors:  Elham Kashefi; Maggie Mort
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Developing an assessment tool for evaluating community involvement.

Authors:  Jane South; Pat Fairfax; Eleanor Green
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  The role of community representatives on health service committees: staff expectations vs. reality.

Authors:  Sally Nathan; Lynda Johnston; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research.

Authors:  Jill Thompson; Rosemary Barber; Paul R Ward; Jonathan D Boote; Cindy L Cooper; Christopher J Armitage; Georgina Jones
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Costs and effects of a 'healthy living' approach to community development in two deprived communities: findings from a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Helen A Snooks; Bridie Angela Evans; David Cohen; Michael Nugent; Frances Rapport; Jon Skone; Angie Meredith; Tricia Davies; Diana O'Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Public involvement in research about environmental change and health: A case study.

Authors:  Kath Maguire; Ruth Garside; Jo Poland; Lora E Fleming; Ian Alcock; Tim Taylor; Helen Macintyre; Gianni Lo Iacono; Andrew Green; Benedict W Wheeler
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2019-03

7.  A critical discourse analysis of how public participants and their evidence are presented in health impact assessment reports in Wales.

Authors:  Chris Emmerson; Fiona Wood
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  What will it take to get the evidential value of lay knowledge recognised?

Authors:  Jennie Popay
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 9.  Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review.

Authors:  Felix Gradinger; Nicky Britten; Katrina Wyatt; Katherine Froggatt; Andy Gibson; Ann Jacoby; Fiona Lobban; Debbie Mayes; Dee Snape; Tim Rawcliffe; Jennie Popay
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  A devolved model for public involvement in the field of mental health research: case study learning.

Authors:  Pam Moule; Rosie Davies
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.