Literature DB >> 11822194

Development of the Functional Assessment Taxonomy.

E A Gaudino1, L N Matheson, F A Mael.   

Abstract

The development of the Functional Assessment Taxonomy is described and the taxonomy is presented. The taxonomy provides a method to classify and organize constructs that are used to assess the functional abilities of people with medical impairments to determine work disability. The taxonomy has 131 constructs that are organized into 33 conceptual factors that are nested in 5 domains. Each construct is defined and is categorized in terms of the work disability model and the unit of analysis that is commonly used to measure the construct. The use of the taxonomy in the Disability Methodology Redesign Project is described. Other possible uses for the taxonomy are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11822194     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013022410767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  16 in total

1.  The difference between disability and impairment: A distinction worth making.

Authors:  J M Walker
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1993-09

2.  Prediction of return to work by rehabilitation professionals.

Authors:  C A Velozo; P J Lustman; D M Cole; J A Montag; B Eubanks
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1991-12

Review 3.  A brief history and comparative analysis of disability systems and impairment rating guides.

Authors:  J V Luck; D W Florence
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Impairment, disability, and handicap.

Authors:  V Mooney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The prediction of long-term functional outcomes of children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  R S O'Grady; L S Crain; J Kohn
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.449

6.  Prediction of success from a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  J Hildebrandt; M Pfingsten; P Saur; J Jansen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Predicting community reintegration after spinal cord injury from demographic and injury characteristics.

Authors:  G Whiteneck; D Tate; S Charlifue
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Determining disability due to mental impairment: APA's evaluation of Social Security Administration guidelines.

Authors:  H A Pincus; C Kennedy; S J Simmens; H H Goldman; P Sirovatka; S S Sharfstein
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Predicting follow-up functional outcomes in outpatient rehabilitation.

Authors:  J G Baker; R C Fiedler; K J Ottenbacher; J J Czyrny; A W Heinemann
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure.

Authors:  A W Heinemann; J M Linacre; B D Wright; B B Hamilton; C Granger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  8 in total

1.  Disability methodology redesign: considerations for a new approach to disability determination.

Authors:  L N Matheson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-09

Review 2.  History, design characteristics, and uses of the pictorial activity and task sorts.

Authors:  Leonard N Matheson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

3.  Reliability and validity of a new computer-administered pictorial activity and task sort.

Authors:  John Mayer; Vert Mooney; Leonard Matheson; Scott Leggett; Joe Verna; Greg Balourdas; Greg DeFilippo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06

4.  Functional and work capacity evaluation issues.

Authors:  Warren T Jahn; Leanne N Cupon; John H Steinbaugh
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2004

5.  Development of a database of functional assessment measures related to work disability.

Authors:  L N Matheson; V Kaskutas; S McCowan; H Shaw; C Webb
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-09

6.  Conceptual foundation for measures of physical function and behavioral health function for Social Security work disability evaluation.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Marfeo; Stephen M Haley; Alan M Jette; Susan V Eisen; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Bogusz; Mark Meterko; Christine M McDonough; Leighton Chan; Diane E Brandt; Elizabeth K Rasch
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Development of a self-report physical function instrument for disability assessment: item pool construction and factor analysis.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Alan M Jette; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Bogusz; Elizabeth E Marfeo; Diane E Brandt; Leighton Chan; Mark Meterko; Stephen M Haley; Elizabeth K Rasch
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Reliability and validity of the Disability Assessment Structured Interview (DASI): a tool for assessing functional limitations in claimants.

Authors:  Jerry Spanjer; Boudien Krol; Sandra Brouwer; Roel Popping; Johan W Groothoff; Jac J L van der Klink
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.