Literature DB >> 11822192

Disability methodology redesign: considerations for a new approach to disability determination.

L N Matheson1.   

Abstract

Disability determination meets important societal needs, involving billions of dollars and millions of people every year. However, disability determination decisions often are incorrect, and the high proportion of decision appeals and reversals creates additional administrative expense and difficulty for the people that the disability determination system is intended to support. Projects funded by the United States Social Security Administration explored these issues and developed new conceptual models and tools to improve the accuracy and fairness of disability determination. This paper provides an introduction to the projects and the papers in this special issue of the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11822192     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013052709858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  10 in total

1.  Recommendations to guide revision of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. American Medical Association.

Authors:  E A Spieler; P S Barth; J F Burton; J Himmelstein; L Rudolph
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Development of the Functional Assessment Taxonomy.

Authors:  E A Gaudino; L N Matheson; F A Mael
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-09

3.  Development of new methods to determine work disability in the United States.

Authors:  L N Matheson; M Kane; D Rodbard
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-09

4.  Validity of work-related assessments.

Authors:  Ev Innes; Leon Straker
Journal:  Work       Date:  1999

5.  Reliability of work-related assessments.

Authors:  Ev Innes; Leon Straker
Journal:  Work       Date:  1999

6.  Development of a database of functional assessment measures related to work disability.

Authors:  L N Matheson; V Kaskutas; S McCowan; H Shaw; C Webb
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-09

7.  Functional assessment taxonomy relevant to low-back impairments.

Authors:  M Halpern
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-09

Review 8.  Unique issues in assessing work function among individuals with psychiatric disabilities.

Authors:  K MacDonald-Wilson; E S Rogers; W A Anthony
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-09

9.  Plan for a new disability claim process.

Authors: 
Journal:  Soc Secur Bull       Date:  1994

10.  Determining disability due to mental impairment: APA's evaluation of Social Security Administration guidelines.

Authors:  H A Pincus; C Kennedy; S J Simmens; H H Goldman; P Sirovatka; S S Sharfstein
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 18.112

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Conceptual foundation for measures of physical function and behavioral health function for Social Security work disability evaluation.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Marfeo; Stephen M Haley; Alan M Jette; Susan V Eisen; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Bogusz; Mark Meterko; Christine M McDonough; Leighton Chan; Diane E Brandt; Elizabeth K Rasch
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Development of a self-report physical function instrument for disability assessment: item pool construction and factor analysis.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Alan M Jette; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Bogusz; Elizabeth E Marfeo; Diane E Brandt; Leighton Chan; Mark Meterko; Stephen M Haley; Elizabeth K Rasch
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.966

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.