Literature DB >> 11821607

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in the management of endometrial carcinoma.

Tom P Manolitsas1, Anthony J McCartney.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with open hysterectomy in the management of endometrial carcinoma.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
SETTING: Gynecologic cancer center. PATIENTS: All women with endometrial carcinoma managed between January 1, 1993, and June 30, 1999.
INTERVENTIONS: Of 403 patients reviewed, in 161 (40%) the surgical intention was laparoscopic management, in 230 (57%) the intention was open management, and in 12 (3%) it was vaginal hysterectomy. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy was successfully completed in 153 (95%) of the laparoscopic group.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean weight of women in the laparoscopic group (80.1 kg) was greater than that in the open group (73.3 kg, p = 0.002), and included 27 patients weighing over 100 kg (maximum individual weight 170 kg). Mean operating times were 138 minutes for laparoscopy and 121 minutes for the open procedure (p = 0.002). Complications differed, with significantly more occurring in the open group (43%, 100) than in the laparoscopic group (17%, 27, p <0.00001). Mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic group (4.3 days) than for the open group (8.5 days, p = 0.0001). Conclusion. TLH combined with laparoscopic surgical staging has many advantages over the open approach, especially in obese women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11821607     DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60105-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc        ISSN: 1074-3804


  7 in total

Review 1.  The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Bo Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Use of Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer - Results of a 2012 Germany-wide Survey.

Authors:  I Juhasz-Böss; P Mallmann; C P Möller; E F Solomayer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of endometrial carcinoma in morbidly obese patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Özgür Bige; Ahmet Demir; Bahadır Saatli; Meral Koyuncuoğlu; Uğur Saygılı
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-07-14

4.  Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: increasing body mass index does not impact postoperative complications.

Authors:  C William Helm; Cibi Arumugam; Mary E Gordinier; Daniel S Metzinger; Jianmin Pan; Shesh N Rai
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 5.  Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of controlled trials.

Authors:  Claudia B M Bijen; Karin M Vermeulen; Marian J E Mourits; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: a randomized multi center study.

Authors:  Claudia B M Bijen; Justine M Briët; Geertruida H de Bock; Henriëtte J G Arts; Johanna A Bergsma-Kadijk; Marian J E Mourits
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Assessment of selected perioperative parameters in patients undergoing laparoscopic and abdominal supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jakub Sokołowski; Joanna Skręt-Magierło; Tomasz Kluz; Edyta Barnaś; Marek Sobolewski; Renata Raś; Andrzej Skręt
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2015-12-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.