Literature DB >> 11821279

Outcome of conventional IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes in mild male factor infertility.

Michelle Plachot1, Joëlle Belaisch-Allart, Jean-Marc Mayenga, Albert Chouraqui, Laurent Tesquier, Alain Michel Serkine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decisions concerning the treatment choice for assisted reproduction (IVF or ICSI) are usually made after the evaluation of male fertility factors, or after taking into account the results of previous IVF attempts. There are no widely accepted criteria, so decisions for couples with male subfertility are often empirical and may lead to complete fertilization failure after IVF, or to the unnecessary use of ICSI.
METHODS: A study was conducted in which half the oocytes from each of 58 couples with moderate oligo +/- astheno +/- teratozoospermia were inseminated (conventional IVF) and the other half microinjected (ICSI). The technique used for subsequent cycles depended on the results of the first cycle.
RESULTS: Nineteen of the 58 IVF/ICSI attempts resulted in fertilization after ICSI only (32.8%) and 39 in fertilization after IVF and ICSI (67.2%). For patients with oocyte fertilization only after ICSI, 61.5% of the oocytes microinjected were fertilized. A mean of 2.2 embryos per patient were transferred, leading to eight clinical pregnancies (42.1%). The implantation rate was 21.4%. All subsequent cycles were carried out with ICSI. Couples with oocyte fertilization after both IVF and ICSI had slightly better semen characteristics than those with oocyte fertilization only after ICSI, but this difference was not significant. Overall, no statistically significant difference was observed between IVF and ICSI in sibling oocytes for any of the variables studied: fertilization rate, embryo morphology and rates of development, pregnancy and implantation. Although only small numbers of oocytes or embryos were available for each couple, six couples had lower fertilization rates after IVF and eight had lower embryo quality after IVF. Eight patients had lower sperm quality in the second cycle, and only seven couples underwent subsequent IVF cycles.
CONCLUSIONS: This strategy enabled us to avoid 32.8% of complete fertilization failures after IVF, but not to decrease significantly the number of ICSI attempts in subsequent cycles. However, the uncertainties concerning the safety of ICSI suggest that ICSI should be used cautiously and judiciously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11821279     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.2.362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  30 in total

Review 1.  Male factor infertility and ART.

Authors:  Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Efficient reproduction of cynomolgus monkey using pronuclear embryo transfer technique.

Authors:  Qiang Sun; Juan Dong; Wenting Yang; Yujuan Jin; Mingying Yang; Yan Wang; Philip L Wang; Yinghe Hu; Joe Z Tsien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Short gamete co-incubation during in vitro fertilization decreases the fertilization rate and does not improve embryo quality: a prospective auto controlled study.

Authors:  V Barraud-Lange; C Sifer; K Pocaté; A Ziyyat; B Martin-Pont; R Porcher; J N Hugues; J P Wolf
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with four or fewer oocytes retrieved?

Authors:  Martha Luna; Catherine Bigelow; Marlena Duke; Jane Ruman; Benjamin Sandler; Lawrence Grunfeld; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  ALWAYS ICSI? A SWOT analysis.

Authors:  E Bosch; J J Espinós; F Fabregues; J Fontes; J García-Velasco; J Llácer; A Requena; M A Checa; J Bellver
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Does omitting teratospermia as a selection criterion for ICSI change pregnancy rates?

Authors:  Bonnie Woolnough; Doron Shmorgun; Marie-Claude Leveille; Elham Sabri; Jenna Gale
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Can dissenting findings regarding the comparative effectiveness of ICSI and IVF be explained by a learning curve?

Authors:  Duncan Mortimer; Simon French
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-10-01

9.  Assisting in vitro fertilization by manipulating cumulus-oocyte-complexes either mechanically or enzymatically does not prevent IVF failure.

Authors:  Thomas Ebner; Marianne Moser; Omar Shebl; Richard Mayer; Gernot Tews
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01

10.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization are complementary techniques in management of unexplained infertility.

Authors:  Kamal Jaroudi; Saad Al-Hassan; Hamad Al-Sufayan; Hind Al-Mayman; Meshal Qeba; Serdar Coskun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.