Literature DB >> 11820224

Variations in skin dose associated with linac bed material at 6 MV x-ray energy.

Martin J Butso1, Tsang Cheung, Peter K N Yu, Belinda Webb.   

Abstract

Treatment with radiotherapy x-rays at 6 MV energy produces a build-up effect whereby a smaller dose is delivered to the patient's skin compared to the tumour dose. With anterior fields, no material is normally placed over the patient's skin, thus providing the maximum skin sparing possible with the beam configuration used. A posterior beam normally passes through the treatment couch top and increases the dose delivered to the patient's skin. Both the Mylar sheeting and the support ribbing material produce a significant increase in skin dose. Measurements at 6 MV have shown that the basal cell layer dose can be increased by up to 51% of maximum dose with a carbon fibre/Mylar couch and by 28% for a tennis string/Mylar couch when compared to anterior beams. These values are associated with the position of the carbon fibre or tennis string ribbing. Dermal layer doses are increased by up to 30 and 24% of maximum dose for carbon fibre and tennis string, respectively. These values include a combination of dose due to the support ribbing and the Mylar sheeting. Due to the variability in patient positioning on the couch top, these increases would be spread out over the skin surface producing an average increase per unit area at the basal layer of up to 32 and 20% of the maximum, respectively, for carbon fibre and tennis string couch tops and 21 and 12% at the dermal layer compared to dose at Dmax.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11820224     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/1/404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of surface dose delivered by 7 MV-unflattened and 6 MV-flattened photon beams.

Authors:  Ashokkumar Sigamani; Arunai Nambiraj
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-04-25

2.  Impact of 6MV photon beam attenuation by carbon fiber couch and immobilization devices in IMRT planning and dose delivery.

Authors:  R K Munjal; P S Negi; A G Babu; S N Sinha; A K Anand; T Kataria
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2006-04

3.  Dosimetric Evaluation of the QFix kVueTM Calypso Couch Top.

Authors:  Lingtong Hou; Huiqin Zhang; Xiaomei Sun; Qianqian Liu; Tingfeng Chen; Yong Liu; Xiaodong Jiang; Shengyu Yao
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

4.  Radiation dosimetry effect evaluation of a carbon fiber couch on novel uRT-linac 506c accelerator.

Authors:  Dazhen Jiang; Zhen Cao; Yongchang Wei; Tingting Cao; Jiuling Shen; Conghua Xie; Yunfeng Zhou; Hui Liu; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  An investigation of the depth dose in the build-up region, and surface dose for a 6-MV therapeutic photon beam: Monte Carlo simulation and measurements.

Authors:  Lukkana Apipunyasopon; Somyot Srisatit; Nakorn Phaisangittisakul
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Surface dose measurements and comparison of unflattened and flattened photon beams.

Authors:  Ashokkumar Sigamani; Arunai Nambiraj; Girigesh Yadav; Ananda Giribabu; Karthikeyan Srinivasan; Venkadamanickam Gurusamy; Kothanda Raman; Kaviarasu Karunakaran; Rajesh Thiyagarajan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

7.  Surface and buildup dose characteristics for 6, 10, and 18 MV photons from an Elekta Precise linear accelerator.

Authors:  Eric E Klein; Jacqueline Esthappan; Zuofeng Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Skin dose during radiotherapy: a summary and general estimation technique.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Susan A Smith; Rita Weathers; Marilyn Stovall
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Investigating treatment dose error due to beam attenuation by a carbon fiber tabletop.

Authors:  W Kenji Myint; Malgorzata Niedbala; David Wilkins; Lee H Gerig
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Dosimetric effects of a repositioning head frame system and treatment planning system dose calculation accuracy.

Authors:  Carlos Ferrer; Concepción Huertas; Rodrigo Plaza; Zulima Aza; Eva Corredoira
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.