Literature DB >> 11818202

Evaluation of good clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

R J Burcombe1, A Makris, M Pittam, J Lowe, J Emmott, W L Wong.   

Abstract

To determine whether [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) can predict complete pathological response (pCR) in patients achieving a good clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer, 10 patients underwent FDG PET scanning prior to definitive breast surgery. Scan reports were compared with histopathological findings. No abnormal uptake at the primary tumour site was visualised in any patient. 9 of the 10 patients had residual invasive carcinoma at operation, ranging from 2 to 20 mm in maximum dimension. One patient achieved a complete pathological response. Of the 5 patients who underwent axillary surgery, no axillary FDG uptake was seen preoperatively although 3 of the 5 were histologically node-positive. FDG PET did not reliably identify residual disease in this series of good clinical responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and its discriminatory power as a tool to predict complete pathological response therefore appears to be inadequate for clinical use in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11818202     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00379-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  14 in total

Review 1.  Measuring response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to determine clinical responses of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ai Amioka; Norio Masumoto; Noriko Gouda; Keiko Kajitani; Hideo Shigematsu; Akiko Emi; Takayuki Kadoya; Morihito Okada
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Early restaging whole-body (18)F-FDG PET during induction chemotherapy predicts clinical outcome in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ruoh-Fang Yen; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Lai-Lei Ting; Kai-Yuan Tzen; Mei-Hsiu Pan; Ruey-Long Hong
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Function-preserving surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hideo Inaji; Chiyomi Egawa; Yoshifumi Komoike; Kazuyoshi Motomura; Kinji Nishiyama; Tatsuki R Kataoka; Hiroki Koyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Claude Touzery; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Bruno Coudert; Laurent Arnould; Christophe Boichot; Alexandre Cochet; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  A systematic review of FDG-PET in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Escalona; J A Blasco; M M Reza; E Andradas; N Gómez
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT predicts survival in patients with inflammatory breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Selin Carkaci; Christopher T Sherman; Efe Ozkan; Beatriz E Adrada; Wei Wei; Eric M Rohren; Osama R Mawlawi; Naoto T Ueno; Thomas A Buchholz; Wei T Yang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  The role of SPET and PET in monitoring tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  Chariklia Giannopoulou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  J Dose-Schwarz; R Tiling; S Avril-Sassen; S Mahner; A Lebeau; C Weber; M Schwaiger; F Jänicke; M Untch; N Avril
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Breast imaging in the new era.

Authors:  K Planche; S Vinnicombe
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.