Literature DB >> 11816193

Distraction osteogenesis: past, present, and future.

M J Troulis1, B Padwa, L B Kaban.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 11816193     DOI： 10.1055/s-2008-1064346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Facial Plast Surg        ISSN： 0736-6825            Impact factor:   1.446


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Assessment of Mandibular Distraction Regenerate Using Ultrasonography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Jitender Dabas; Sujata Mohanty; Zainab Chaudhary; Amita Rani
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-09-24

2.  Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Matthew E Lawler; William C Faquin; John C Magill; Brian A Murphy; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis may allow faster distraction rates: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Brian A Murphy; John C Magill; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Clinical application of curvilinear distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular deformities.

Authors:  Leonard B Kaban; Edward B Seldin; Ron Kikinis; Krishna Yeshwant; Bonnie L Padwa; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular abnormalities.

Authors:  Vinayak Karun; Navneet Agarwal; Virendra Singh
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.