Literature DB >> 11816100

Current use of bone substitutes in maxillofacial surgery.

S Govindaraj1, P D Costantino, C D Friedman.   

Abstract

The use of bone substitutes in the field of facial plastic and reconstructive surgery is well established. Because of the complexity of the anatomy in the head and neck region, reconstruction and augmentation of this area pose a challenge to the surgeon. In addition, the shortcomings of autogenous bone, such as resorption and donor site morbidity, have led to the need for alloplastic implants in the field of facial plastic surgery. Multiple alloplastic implants are currently in use today; however, those compounds that contain calcium, silicon, and carbon have been examined more closely in this article. This is because of their ability to osseointegrate and osseoconduct with surrounding fibro-osseous tissue, as well as demonstrate a higher immunogenic tolerance by the human body. The discussion of each compound includes a description of its composition and structure, the advantages and shortcomings of the material, and its current uses in the field of facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. With a better understanding of the available alloplastic implants, the surgeon can make a more informed decision as to which implant would be most suitable in a particular patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11816100     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1064302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 0736-6825            Impact factor:   1.446


  7 in total

1.  Quantification of bone mass gain in response to the application of biphasic bioceramics and platelet concentrate in critical-size bone defects.

Authors:  Sonja Ellen Lobo; Francisco Henrique Lanna Wykrota; Ana Carolina Marques Barbosa Oliveira; Irina Kerkis; Germán Bohorquez Mahecha; Humberto José Alves
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Preparation and characterization of calcium phosphate biomaterials.

Authors:  A R Calafiori; G Di Marco; G Martino; M Marotta
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Bone substitutes for peri-implant defects of postextraction implants.

Authors:  Pâmela Letícia Santos; Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli; Cristino da Silva Telles; Walter Betoni Júnior; Roberta Okamoto; Vivian Chiacchio Buchignani; Thallita Pereira Queiroz
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2013-12-12

4.  Clinical evaluation of 3D printed nano-porous hydroxyapatite bone graft for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pennapa Kijartorn; Jirapa Wongpairojpanich; Faungchat Thammarakcharoen; Jintamai Suwanprateeb; Borvornwut Buranawat
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.080

5.  Bone Regeneration of a 3D-Printed Alloplastic and Particulate Xenogenic Graft with rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Ji-In Ryu; Byoung-Eun Yang; Sang-Min Yi; Hyo Geun Choi; Sung-Woon On; Seok Jin Hong; Ho-Kyung Lim; Soo-Hwan Byun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Dimensional Ridge Preservation with a Novel Highly Porous TiO(2) Scaffold: An Experimental Study in Minipigs.

Authors:  Hanna Tiainen; Anders Verket; Håvard J Haugen; S Petter Lyngstadaas; Johan Caspar Wohlfahrt
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-10-03

7.  Scattering of therapeutic radiation in the presence of craniofacial bone reconstruction materials.

Authors:  Joonas Toivonen; Mikko Björkqvist; Heikki Minn; Pekka K Vallittu; Jami Rekola
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.