Literature DB >> 11815494

Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education: a randomized study.

Patti L Rickheim1, Todd W Weaver, Jill L Flader, David M Kendall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The current study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of delivering diabetes education in either a group or individual setting using a consistent, evidence-based curriculum. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 170 subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to either group (n = 87) or individual (n = 83) educational settings. Subjects received education in four sequential sessions delivered at consistent time intervals over a 6-month period. Outcomes included changes in knowledge, self-management behaviors, weight, BMI, HbA(1c), health-related quality of life, patient attitudes, and medication regimen. Changes were assessed at baseline and after the 2-week, 3-month, and 6-month education sessions.
RESULTS: Both educational settings had similar improvements in knowledge, BMI, health-related quality of life, attitudes, and all other measured indicators. HbA(1c) decreased from 8.5 +/- 1.8% at baseline to 6.5 +/- 0.8% at 6 months (P < 0.01) in the study population as a whole. Subjects assigned to the individual setting had a 1.7 +/- 1.9% reduction in HbA(1c) (P < 0.01), whereas subjects assigned to the group setting had a 2.5 +/- 1.8% reduction in HbA(1c) (P < 0.01). The difference in HbA(1c) improvement was marginally greater in subjects assigned to group education versus individualized education (P = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that diabetes education delivered in a group setting, when compared with an individual setting, was equally effective at providing equivalent or slightly greater improvements in glycemic control. Group diabetes education was similarly effective in delivering key educational components and may allow for more efficient and cost-effective methods in the delivery of diabetes education programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11815494     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.2.269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  74 in total

1.  Is weight loss the best lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes?

Authors:  Marion J Franz
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  New Diabetes Nutrition Therapy Recommendations: What You Need to Know.

Authors:  Alison B Evert; Jackie L Boucher
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2014-05

5.  Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  [Systematic review of group educational interventions in type-2 diabetes patients].

Authors:  T Sanz-Cuesta; M I Del Cura-González; A Azcoaga-Lorenzo; A I González-González; M E Tello-Bernabé; G Rodríguez-Gabriel; S Artola-Méndez; M Girbés-Fontana; A López
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.137

7.  Should group education classes be separated by type of diabetes?

Authors:  Arlene Smaldone; Om P Ganda; Sheila McMurrich; Keri Hannagan; Susan Lin; A Enrique Caballero; Katie Weinger
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Supporting self-care in general practice.

Authors:  Colin J Greaves; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.