Literature DB >> 11812960

Application of preoperative portal vein embolization before major hepatic resection in patients with normal or abnormal liver parenchyma.

Hisao Wakabayashi1, Ken Ishimura, Keiichi Okano, Yukihiko Karasawa, Fuminori Goda, Takashi Maeba, Hajime Maeta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical parameters influencing the effect of preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) in hypertrophying the nonembolized lobe of patients with either normal or abnormal liver parenchyma and its effect upon portal pressure were examined to identify the patient population for whom this approach is most suited.
METHODS: The study population included 43 patients undergoing major hepatectomy after PVE. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their liver parenchyma: 17 patients with normal liver parenchyma (N group) and 26 patients with damaged liver parenchyma due to viral hepatitis (D group). We calculated the correlation between volumetric increases in the nonembolized (left) lobe after PVE (hypertrophic ratio = post-PVE left lobe volume/pre-PVE left lobe volume) using computed tomography volumetry before and 2 weeks after PVE. Clinical parameters also were examined to identify those parameters modifying the hypertrophic ratio in each group, and changes in portal pressure by PVE and the subsequent hepatectomy were recorded. Finally, by comparing patients with or without postoperative liver failure after hepatectomy, the influence of the hypertrophic ratio and portal pressure on the outcome of subsequent hepatectomy was examined.
RESULTS: The hypertrophic ratio was 1.34 +/- 0.23 in the N group, and 1.25 +/- 0.21 in the D group. This difference was not significant. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the parenchymal volumetric rate of the right lobe (PVR) in the D group and both PVR and prothrombin time in the N group were independent parameters predicting the hypertrophic ratio. The portal pressure increased immediately after PVE and was similar in both groups to levels after hepatectomy. Six patients in the D group experienced postoperative liver dysfunction. In 5 of these 6 patients, the hypertrophic ratio was below 1.2, and the portal pressure was higher than that in patients without liver dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: PVE induces hypertrophy of the nonembolized lobe of both abnormal and normal liver parenchyma, and the effect was predictable. Postoperative liver failure appeared to be more severe in patients having a lower hypertrophic ratio and higher portal pressure in abnormal liver parenchyma, however. PVE also may have diagnostic use in predicting portal pressure after hepatectomy, which may be associated with surgical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11812960     DOI: 10.1067/msy.2002.118259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  24 in total

Review 1.  Protection of the liver during hepatic surgery.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Clavien; Jean Emond; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Jacques Belghiti; Ravi S Chari; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Systematic review of pathophysiological changes following hepatic resection.

Authors:  Joey Siu; John McCall; Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Increase in left liver lobe function after preoperative right portal vein embolisation assessed with gadolinium-EOB-DTPA MRI.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Lutz Lüdemann; Thomas Keuchel; Maciej Malinowski; Daniel Seehofer; Martin Stockmann; Bernd Hamm; Bernhard Gebauer; Timm Denecke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Sequential arterial and portal vein embolization in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: the hospital beaujon experience.

Authors:  Valérie Vilgrain; Annie Sibert; Magaly Zappa; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with well-preserved liver function and cirrhotic background: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Xinqiang Wu; Zejian Huang; Wan Yee Lau; Wenda Li; Pai Lin; Lei Zhang; Yajin Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Portal vein embolisation for extended hepatectomy: single-centre experience.

Authors:  Soumil Vyas; Clare Bent; Stefano Partelli; Ajit T Abraham; Robert R Hutchins; Satyajit Bhattacharya; Deborah Low; Tim Fotheringham; Hemant M Kocher
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-09

7.  Practical questions in liver metastases of colorectal cancer: general principles of treatment.

Authors:  Héctor Daniel González; Joan Figueras
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Role of preoperative selective portal vein embolization in two-step curative hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Wu Ji; Jie-Shou Li; Ling-Tang Li; Wu-Hong Liu; Kuan-Sheng Ma; Xiang-Tian Wang; Zhen-Ping He; Jia-Hong Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  [Right portal vein ligation prior to extended right hemihepatectomy for synchronous colorectal liver metastases].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; K Schleimer; K T E Beckurts; H G Brochhagen; D L Stippel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Kinetic growth rate after portal vein embolization predicts posthepatectomy outcomes: toward zero liver-related mortality in patients with colorectal liver metastases and small future liver remnant.

Authors:  Junichi Shindoh; Mark J Truty; Thomas A Aloia; Steven A Curley; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Steven Y Huang; Armeen Mahvash; Sanjay Gupta; Michael J Wallace; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.