BACKGROUND: Standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) volume and degree of hypertrophy after portal vein embolization (PVE) have been recognized as important predictors of surgical outcomes after major liver resection. However, the regeneration rate of the FLR after PVE varies among individuals and its clinical significance is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Kinetic growth rate (KGR) is defined as the degree of hypertrophy at initial volume assessment divided by number of weeks elapsed after PVE. In 107 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with an sFLR volume >20%, the ability of the KGR to predict overall and liver-specific postoperative morbidity and mortality was compared with sFLR volume and degree of hypertrophy. RESULTS: Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the best cutoff values for sFLR volume, degree of hypertrophy, and KGR for predicting postoperative hepatic insufficiency were estimated as 29.6%, 7.5%, and 2.0% per week, respectively. Among these, KGR was the most accurate predictor (area under the curve 0.830 [95% CI, 0.736-0.923]; asymptotic significance, 0.002). A KGR of <2% per week vs ≥2% per week correlates with rates of hepatic insufficiency (21.6% vs 0%; p = 0.0001) and liver-related 90-day mortality (8.1% vs 0%; p = 0.04). The predictive value of KGR was not influenced by sFLR volume or the timing of initial volume assessment when evaluated within 8 weeks after PVE. CONCLUSIONS: Kinetic growth rate is a better predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality after liver resection for small FLR than conventional measured volume parameters (ie, sFLR volume and degree of hypertrophy).
BACKGROUND: Standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) volume and degree of hypertrophy after portal vein embolization (PVE) have been recognized as important predictors of surgical outcomes after major liver resection. However, the regeneration rate of the FLR after PVE varies among individuals and its clinical significance is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Kinetic growth rate (KGR) is defined as the degree of hypertrophy at initial volume assessment divided by number of weeks elapsed after PVE. In 107 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with an sFLR volume >20%, the ability of the KGR to predict overall and liver-specific postoperative morbidity and mortality was compared with sFLR volume and degree of hypertrophy. RESULTS: Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the best cutoff values for sFLR volume, degree of hypertrophy, and KGR for predicting postoperative hepatic insufficiency were estimated as 29.6%, 7.5%, and 2.0% per week, respectively. Among these, KGR was the most accurate predictor (area under the curve 0.830 [95% CI, 0.736-0.923]; asymptotic significance, 0.002). A KGR of <2% per week vs ≥2% per week correlates with rates of hepatic insufficiency (21.6% vs 0%; p = 0.0001) and liver-related 90-day mortality (8.1% vs 0%; p = 0.04). The predictive value of KGR was not influenced by sFLR volume or the timing of initial volume assessment when evaluated within 8 weeks after PVE. CONCLUSIONS: Kinetic growth rate is a better predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality after liver resection for small FLR than conventional measured volume parameters (ie, sFLR volume and degree of hypertrophy).
Authors: David C Madoff; Eddie K Abdalla; Sanjay Gupta; Tsung-Teh Wu; Jeffrey S Morris; Alban Denys; Michael J Wallace; Frank A Morello; Kamran Ahrar; Ravi Murthy; Simon Lunagomez; Marshall E Hicks; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: K Ishak; A Baptista; L Bianchi; F Callea; J De Groote; F Gudat; H Denk; V Desmet; G Korb; R N MacSween Journal: J Hepatol Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: David E Kleiner; Elizabeth M Brunt; Mark Van Natta; Cynthia Behling; Melissa J Contos; Oscar W Cummings; Linda D Ferrell; Yao-Chang Liu; Michael S Torbenson; Aynur Unalp-Arida; Matthew Yeh; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: David C Madoff; Marshall E Hicks; Eddie K Abdalla; Jeffrey S Morris; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-02-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Timothy M Pawlik; Eddie K Abdalla; James F Arens; Rabih A Nemr; Steven H Wei; Debra L Kennamer; Lee M Ellis; Steven A Curley Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: M Makuuchi; B L Thai; K Takayasu; T Takayama; T Kosuge; P Gunvén; S Yamazaki; H Hasegawa; H Ozaki Journal: Surgery Date: 1990-05 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: K Kubota; M Makuuchi; K Kusaka; T Kobayashi; K Miki; K Hasegawa; Y Harihara; T Takayama Journal: Hepatology Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Margo Shoup; Mithat Gonen; Michael D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; Ronald P DeMatteo; Lawrence H Schwartz; Scott Tuorto; Leslie H Blumgart; Yuman Fong Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Kristopher P Croome; Shennen A Mao; Jaime M Glorioso; Murli Krishna; Scott L Nyberg; David M Nagorney Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-08-02 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Universe Leung; Amber L Simpson; Raphael L C Araujo; Mithat Gönen; Conor McAuliffe; Michael I Miga; E Patricia Parada; Peter J Allen; Michael I D'Angelica; T Peter Kingham; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; William R Jarnagin Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Junichi Shindoh; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Thomas A Aloia; Steven A Curley; Steven Y Huang; Armeen Mahvash; Sanjay Gupta; Michael J Wallace; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Yoshihiro Mise; Thomas A Aloia; Claudius Conrad; Steven Y Huang; Michael J Wallace; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.452