Literature DB >> 11812819

Mode of DNA-protein interaction between the C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit and T7D promoter UP element.

O N Ozoline1, N Fujita, A Ishihama.   

Abstract

The C-terminal domain (CTD) downstream from residue 235 of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit is involved in recognition of the promoter UP element. Here we have demonstrated, by DNase I and hydroxyl radical mapping, the presence of two UP element subsites on the promoter D of phage T7, each located half and one-and-a-half helix turns, respectively, upstream from the promoter -35 element. This non-typical UP element retained its alphaCTD-binding capability when transferred into the genetic environment of the rrnBP1 basic promoter, leading to transcription stimulation as high as the typical rrnBP1 UP element. Chemical protease FeBABE conjugated to alphaCTD S309C efficiently attacked the T7D UP element but not the rrnBP1 UP element. After alanine scanning, most of the amino acid residues that were involved in rrnBP1 interaction were also found to be involved in T7D UP element recognition, but alanine substitution at three residues had the opposite effect on the transcription activation between rrnBP1 and T7D promoters. Mutation E286A stimulated T7D transcription but inhibited rrnBP1 RNA synthesis, while L290A and K304A stimulated transcription from rrnBP1 but not the T7D promoter. Taken together, we conclude that although the overall sets of amino acid residues responsible for interaction with the two UP elements overlap, the mode of alphaCTD interaction with T7D UP element is different from that with rrnBP1 UP element, involving different residues on helices III and IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11812819      PMCID: PMC97620          DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.24.4909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  40 in total

1.  Bacterial promoter architecture: subsite structure of UP elements and interactions with the carboxy-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit.

Authors:  S T Estrem; W Ross; T Gaal; Z W Chen; W Niu; R H Ebright; R L Gourse
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Fine structure of E. coli RNA polymerase-promoter interactions: alpha subunit binding to the UP element minor groove.

Authors:  W Ross; A Ernst; R L Gourse
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Structural organization of the RNA polymerase-promoter open complex.

Authors:  N Naryshkin; A Revyakin; Y Kim; V Mekler; R H Ebright
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-06-09       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Crystal structure of the holliday junction DNA in complex with a single RuvA tetramer.

Authors:  M Ariyoshi; T Nishino; H Iwasaki; H Shinagawa; K Morikawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Common fold in helix-hairpin-helix proteins.

Authors:  X Shao; N V Grishin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The structure and the characteristic DNA binding property of the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit from Thermus thermophilus.

Authors:  T Wada; T Yamazaki; Y Kyogoku
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-05-26       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Interaction of the C-terminal domain of the E. coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit with the UP element: recognizing the backbone structure in the minor groove surface.

Authors:  K Yasuno; T Yamazaki; Y Tanaka; T S Kodama; A Matsugami; M Katahira; A Ishihama; Y Kyogoku
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-02-16       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Transcription activation mediated by the carboxyl-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha-subunit. Multipoint monitoring using a fluorescent probe.

Authors:  O N Ozoline; N Fujita; A Ishihama
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-01-14       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Structural basis of DNA bridging by barrier-to-autointegration factor.

Authors:  T C Umland; S Q Wei; R Craigie; D R Davies
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Escherichia coli promoters with UP elements of different strengths: modular structure of bacterial promoters.

Authors:  W Ross; S E Aiyar; J Salomon; R L Gourse
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  5 in total

1.  [The regularity of occurrence of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the hypervariability sites control region of the human mitochondrial DNA].

Authors:  I V Kornienko; D I Vodolazhskiĭ
Journal:  Mol Biol (Mosk)       Date:  2010 May-Jun

2.  Comparative genomic analysis of the hexuronate metabolism genes and their regulation in gammaproteobacteria.

Authors:  Inna A Suvorova; Maria N Tutukina; Dmitry A Ravcheev; Dmitry A Rodionov; Olga N Ozoline; Mikhail S Gelfand
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Positive autoregulation of mrkHI by the cyclic di-GMP-dependent MrkH protein in the biofilm regulatory circuit of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  Jason W H Tan; Jonathan J Wilksch; Dianna M Hocking; Nancy Wang; Yogitha N Srikhanta; Marija Tauschek; Trevor Lithgow; Roy M Robins-Browne; Ji Yang; Richard A Strugnell
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Gains and unexpected lessons from genome-scale promoter mapping.

Authors:  K S Shavkunov; I S Masulis; M N Tutukina; A A Deev; O N Ozoline
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The genes of the sulphoquinovose catabolism in Escherichia coli are also associated with a previously unknown pathway of lactose degradation.

Authors:  Anna Kaznadzey; Pavel Shelyakin; Evgeniya Belousova; Aleksandra Eremina; Uliana Shvyreva; Darya Bykova; Vera Emelianenko; Anastasiya Korosteleva; Maria Tutukina; Mikhail S Gelfand
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.