Literature DB >> 11812158

The geometry of domain combination in proteins.

Matthew Bashton1, Cyrus Chothia.   

Abstract

Most proteins in genomes are the result of the recombination of two or more domains. It has been found that if proteins are formed by a combination of domains from superfamilies A and B, then the domains may occur in the sequential order AB or BA but only in about 2% of cases do they occur in both sequential orders. The classical Rossmann domains of known structure are combined with catalytic domains from seven different superfamilies. In addition, there are eight cases where structures with both AB and BA domain combinations are known. For these two sets of structures, we analysed: (i) the relative orientation of the domains; (ii) the type of domain connection; (iii) the structure of the interdomain links; and (iv) domain function. The results of this analysis indicate that in most cases domain order is conserved because recombination of the domains has only occurred once during the course of evolution. Functional reasons become important when the domain connections are short. In seven out of the eight known cases where domains are combined in the AB and BA sequential orders they have different geometrical relationships that give them different functional properties. Copyright 2002 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11812158     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  51 in total

1.  Structural characterization of the human proteome.

Authors:  Arne Müller; Robert M MacCallum; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Placement of the structural proteins in Sindbis virus.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Suchetana Mukhopadhyay; Sergei V Pletnev; Timothy S Baker; Richard J Kuhn; Michael G Rossmann
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Intra-chain 3D segment swapping spawns the evolution of new multidomain protein architectures.

Authors:  András Szilágyi; Yang Zhang; Péter Závodszky
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Multi-domain protein families and domain pairs: comparison with known structures and a random model of domain recombination.

Authors:  Gordana Apic; Wolfgang Huber; Sarah A Teichmann
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

5.  The SUPERFAMILY database in 2004: additions and improvements.

Authors:  Martin Madera; Christine Vogel; Sarah K Kummerfeld; Cyrus Chothia; Julian Gough
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  3D-GENOMICS: a database to compare structural and functional annotations of proteins between sequenced genomes.

Authors:  Keiran Fleming; Arne Müller; Robert M MacCallum; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Comparative analysis of protein domain organization.

Authors:  Yuzhen Ye; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Protein interface conservation across structure space.

Authors:  Qiangfeng Cliff Zhang; Donald Petrey; Raquel Norel; Barry H Honig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Artificial domain duplication replicates evolutionary history of ketol-acid reductoisomerases.

Authors:  Jackson K B Cahn; Sabine Brinkmann-Chen; Andrew R Buller; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Finding biologically relevant protein domain interactions: conserved binding mode analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin A Shoemaker; Anna R Panchenko; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.