Literature DB >> 14649290

Multi-domain protein families and domain pairs: comparison with known structures and a random model of domain recombination.

Gordana Apic1, Wolfgang Huber, Sarah A Teichmann.   

Abstract

There is a limited repertoire of domain families in nature that are duplicated and combined in different ways to form the set of proteins in a genome. Most proteins in both prokaryote and eukaryote genomes consist of two or more domains, and we show that the family size distribution of multi-domain protein families follows a power law like that of individual families. Most domain pairs occur in four to six different domain architectures: in isolation and in combinations with different partners. We showed previously that within the set of all pairwise domain combinations, most small and medium-sized families are observed in combination with one or two other families, while a few large families are very versatile and combine with many different partners. Though this may appear to be a stochastic pattern, in which large families have more combination partners by virtue of their size, we establish here that all the domain families with more than three members in genomes are duplicated more frequently than would be expected by chance considering their number of neighbouring domains. This duplication of domain pairs is statistically significant for between one and three quarters of all families with seven or more members. For the majority of pairwise domain combinations, there is no known three-dimensional structure of the two domains together, and we term these novel combinations. Novel domain combinations are interesting and important targets for structural elucidation, as the geometry and interaction between the domains will help understand the function and evolution of multi-domain proteins. Of particular interest are those combinations that occur in the largest number of multi-domain proteins, and several of these frequent novel combinations contain DNA-binding domains.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14649290     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026113408773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics        ISSN: 1345-711X


  31 in total

Review 1.  Structural genomics: an overview.

Authors:  T L Blundell; K Mizuguchi
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Small-molecule metabolism: an enzyme mosaic.

Authors:  S A Teichmann; S C Rison; J M Thornton; M Riley; J Gough; C Chothia
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 19.536

3.  SUPERFAMILY: HMMs representing all proteins of known structure. SCOP sequence searches, alignments and genome assignments.

Authors:  Julian Gough; Cyrus Chothia
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics.

Authors:  Loredana Lo Conte; Steven E Brenner; Tim J P Hubbard; Cyrus Chothia; Alexey G Murzin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes.

Authors:  J Liu; B Rost
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Annotation transfer for genomics: measuring functional divergence in multi-domain proteins.

Authors:  H Hegyi; M Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  Helen M Berman; Tammy Battistuz; T N Bhat; Wolfgang F Bluhm; Philip E Bourne; Kyle Burkhardt; Zukang Feng; Gary L Gilliland; Lisa Iype; Shri Jain; Phoebe Fagan; Jessica Marvin; David Padilla; Veerasamy Ravichandran; Bohdan Schneider; Narmada Thanki; Helge Weissig; John D Westbrook; Christine Zardecki
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2002-05-29

9.  CDART: protein homology by domain architecture.

Authors:  Lewis Y Geer; Michael Domrachev; David J Lipman; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  An x-ray diffraction study of inhibited derivatives of alpha-chymotrypsin.

Authors:  P B Sigler; B A Jeffery; B W Matthews; D M Blow
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  28 in total

1.  Graph theoretical insights into evolution of multidomain proteins.

Authors:  Teresa Przytycka; George Davis; Nan Song; Dannie Durand
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Modeling the evolution of protein domain architectures using maximum parsimony.

Authors:  Jessica H Fong; Lewis Y Geer; Anna R Panchenko; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  AIDA: ab initio domain assembly for automated multi-domain protein structure prediction and domain-domain interaction prediction.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Lukasz Jaroszewski; Zhanwen Li; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Computational and experimental analyses reveal the essential roles of interdomain linkers in the biological function of chemotaxis histidine kinase CheA.

Authors:  Xiqing Wang; Chun Wu; Anh Vu; Joan-Emma Shea; Frederick W Dahlquist
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Two microcephaly-associated novel missense mutations in CASK specifically disrupt the CASK-neurexin interaction.

Authors:  Leslie E W LaConte; Vrushali Chavan; Abdallah F Elias; Cynthia Hudson; Corbin Schwanke; Katie Styren; Jonathan Shoof; Fernando Kok; Sarika Srivastava; Konark Mukherjee
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Evolution of domain promiscuity in eukaryotic genomes--a perspective from the inferred ancestral domain architectures.

Authors:  Inbar Cohen-Gihon; Jessica H Fong; Roded Sharan; Ruth Nussinov; Teresa M Przytycka; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2010-12-03

7.  Promiscuous Domains in Eukaryotes and HAT Proteins in FUNGI Have Followed Different Evolutionary Paths.

Authors:  Jazmín Murcia-Garzón; Alfonso Méndez-Tenorio
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Expanding the landscape of chromatin modification (CM)-related functional domains and genes in human.

Authors:  Shuye Pu; Andrei L Turinsky; James Vlasblom; Tuan On; Xuejian Xiong; Andrew Emili; Zhaolei Zhang; Jack Greenblatt; John Parkinson; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evolution of networks of protein domain organization.

Authors:  M Fayez Aziz; Gustavo Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Protein domain organisation: adding order.

Authors:  Sarah K Kummerfeld; Sarah A Teichmann
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.