AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence and the independent prognosis of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy by voltage only, ST depression and negative T wave, isolated negative T wave and left ventricular hypertrophy plus ST depression and negative T wave for cardiac morbidity and mortality, without known ischaemic heart disease at baseline. METHODS AND RESULTS: Follow-up data from the Copenhagen City Heart Study were used. Subjects were 5243 men and 6391 women, age range 25-74 years. End-points were (1) myocardial infarction, (2) ischaemic heart disease and (3) cardiovascular disease mortality. Relative risk was age- and sex-adjusted, and multivariately adjusted for known cardiovascular risk factors. During 7 years follow-up, left ventricular hypertrophy plus ST depression and negative T wave had an age-adjusted relative risk of 3.78 (95% confidence interval 2.29-6.25) for myocardial infarction, 4.27 (2.95-6.16) for ischaemic heart disease and 3.75 (2.41-5.85) for cardiovascular disease. A negative T wave, ST depression and negative T wave changes, and left ventricular hypertrophy with negative T wave also carry independent prognostic information for myocardial infarction, ischaemic heart disease and cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy with ST depression and negative T wave changes are the electrocardiographic abnormalities with the greatest prognostic information for future cardiac events. Electrocardiographic negative T waves, ST depression and negative T wave abnormalities and left ventricular hypertrophy with negative T waves, also have prognostic information. Copyright 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.
AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence and the independent prognosis of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy by voltage only, ST depression and negative T wave, isolated negative T wave and left ventricular hypertrophy plus ST depression and negative T wave for cardiac morbidity and mortality, without known ischaemic heart disease at baseline. METHODS AND RESULTS: Follow-up data from the Copenhagen City Heart Study were used. Subjects were 5243 men and 6391 women, age range 25-74 years. End-points were (1) myocardial infarction, (2) ischaemic heart disease and (3) cardiovascular disease mortality. Relative risk was age- and sex-adjusted, and multivariately adjusted for known cardiovascular risk factors. During 7 years follow-up, left ventricular hypertrophy plus ST depression and negative T wave had an age-adjusted relative risk of 3.78 (95% confidence interval 2.29-6.25) for myocardial infarction, 4.27 (2.95-6.16) for ischaemic heart disease and 3.75 (2.41-5.85) for cardiovascular disease. A negative T wave, ST depression and negative T wave changes, and left ventricular hypertrophy with negative T wave also carry independent prognostic information for myocardial infarction, ischaemic heart disease and cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy with ST depression and negative T wave changes are the electrocardiographic abnormalities with the greatest prognostic information for future cardiac events. Electrocardiographic negative T waves, ST depression and negative T wave abnormalities and left ventricular hypertrophy with negative T waves, also have prognostic information. Copyright 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.
Authors: Sara Mutikainen; Alfredo Ortega-Alonso; Markku Alén; Jaakko Kaprio; Jouko Karjalainen; Taina Rantanen; Urho M Kujala Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Daniel A Mulrooney; Elsayed Z Soliman; Matthew J Ehrhardt; Lu Lu; Daniel A Duprez; Russell V Luepker; Gregory T Armstrong; Vijaya M Joshi; Daniel M Green; Deokumar Srivastava; Matthew J Krasin; G Stephen Morris; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kirsten K Ness Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Sara Mutikainen; Alfredo Ortega-Alonso; Markku Alén; Jaakko Kaprio; Jouko Karjalainen; Taina Rantanen; Urho M Kujala Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Peter M Okin; Mary J Roman; Elisa T Lee; James M Galloway; Lyle G Best; Barbara V Howard; Richard B Devereux Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Isaac R Whitman; Vickas V Patel; Elsayed Z Soliman; David A Bluemke; Amy Praestgaard; Aditya Jain; David Herrington; Joao A C Lima; Steven M Kawut Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-09-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Anita Kumar; Ronald J Prineas; Alice M Arnold; Bruce M Psaty; Curt D Furberg; John Robbins; Donald M Lloyd-Jones Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-12-08 Impact factor: 29.690