Literature DB >> 11809471

Better perception of global motion after monocular than after binocular deprivation.

Dave Ellemberg1, Terri L Lewis, Daphne Maurer, Sonia Brar, Henry P Brent.   

Abstract

We used random-dot kinematograms to compare the effects of early monocular versus early binocular deprivation on the development of the perception of the direction of global motion. Patients had been visually deprived by a cataract in one or both eyes from birth or later after a history of normal visual experience. The discrimination of direction of global motion was significantly impaired after early visual deprivation. Surprisingly, impairments were significantly worse after early binocular deprivation than after early monocular deprivation, and the sensitive period was very short. The unexpectedly good results after monocular deprivation suggest that the higher centers involved in the integration of global motion profit from input to the nondeprived eye. These findings suggest that beyond the primary visual cortex, competitive interactions between the eyes can give way to collaborative interactions that enable a relative sparing of some visual functions after monocular deprivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11809471     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00278-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  41 in total

1.  Global motion perception is independent from contrast sensitivity for coherent motion direction discrimination and visual acuity in 4.5-year-old children.

Authors:  Arijit Chakraborty; Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Nabin Paudel; Linda L LaGasse; Barry M Lester; Trecia A Wouldes; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Sensitive period for a multimodal response in human visual motion area MT/MST.

Authors:  Marina Bedny; Talia Konkle; Kevin Pelphrey; Rebecca Saxe; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Functional outcomes following lesions in visual cortex: Implications for plasticity of high-level vision.

Authors:  Tina T Liu; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Visual Stimulus Speed Does Not Influence the Rapid Emergence of Direction Selectivity in Ferret Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Neil J Ritter; Nora M Anderson; Stephen D Van Hooser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A touchscreen based global motion perception task for mice.

Authors:  Jeffrey Stirman; Leah B Townsend; Spencer Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Emerging feed-forward inhibition allows the robust formation of direction selectivity in the developing ferret visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephen D Van Hooser; Gina M Escobar; Arianna Maffei; Paul Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Global motion perception in 2-year-old children: a method for psychophysical assessment and relationships with clinical measures of visual function.

Authors:  Tzu-Ying Yu; Robert J Jacobs; Nicola S Anstice; Nabin Paudel; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.