Literature DB >> 11806635

Rapid restructuring of bicoid-dependent hunchback promoters within and between Dipteran species: implications for molecular coevolution.

A P McGregor1, P J Shaw, J M Hancock, D Bopp, M Hediger, N S Wratten, G A Dover.   

Abstract

Interacting genetic elements need to coevolve if their joint function is to be maintained; for example, the correct binding of transcriptional regulators to defined binding sites in gene promoters needs to be maintained during evolution to ensure proper function. As part of a wider investigation into the molecular coevolution of the Dipteran homeodomain-bearing regulator bicoid (bcd) and Bcd-dependent promoters, we present data on the functional, structural, and sequence differences between the promoters of the segmentation gene hunchback (hb), in several species of Cyclorrhaphan (higher) Diptera. The result of phenocopying hb mutations using RNA interference (RNAi) in Musca domestica shows broadly similar functions to the hb gene in Drosophila melanogaster. However, the Bcd-binding sites in the hb promoters of Drosophila, Musca, and the two blowfly species Lucilia sericata and Calliphora vicina differ in copy number, sequence, orientation, and spacing. Furthermore, all promoters are subject to rapid turnover by slippage-like processes leading to high densities of short repetitive motifs. A study of polymorphism among six strains of M. domestica reveals that turnover by slippage also occurs in the promoter, untranslated leader, and exonic coding sequences of hb, but to different extents. We discuss these results in terms of the known interspecific differences in bcdand the potential coevolution of selected compensatory mutations in trans and cis in response to continuous promoter restructuring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11806635     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.01043.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  29 in total

1.  The transformer2 gene in Musca domestica is required for selecting and maintaining the female pathway of development.

Authors:  Géza Burghardt; Monika Hediger; Christina Siegenthaler; Martin Moser; Andreas Dübendorfer; Daniel Bopp
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  The origin of subfunctions and modular gene regulation.

Authors:  Allan Force; William A Cresko; F Bryan Pickett; Steven R Proulx; Chris Amemiya; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  The animal in the genome: comparative genomics and evolution.

Authors:  Richard R Copley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Mechanisms and evolution of control logic in prokaryotic transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Sacha A F T van Hijum; Marnix H Medema; Oscar P Kuipers
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Co-evolution of transcriptional silencing proteins and the DNA elements specifying their assembly.

Authors:  Oliver A Zill; Devin Scannell; Leonid Teytelman; Jasper Rine
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster and Musca domestica converges at the level of the terminal regulator doublesex.

Authors:  Monika Hediger; Géza Burghardt; Christina Siegenthaler; Nathalie Buser; Denise Hilfiker-Kleiner; Andreas Dübendorfer; Daniel Bopp
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2003-12-13       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Regulatory elements of the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS identified by phylogenetic footprinting and shadowing.

Authors:  Ray L Hong; Lynn Hamaguchi; Maximilian A Busch; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Shape and function of the Bicoid morphogen gradient in dipteran species with different sized embryos.

Authors:  Thomas Gregor; Alistair P McGregor; Eric F Wieschaus
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Coevolution within and between regulatory loci can preserve promoter function despite evolutionary rate acceleration.

Authors:  Antoine Barrière; Kacy L Gordon; Ilya Ruvinsky
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Functional evolution of cis-regulatory modules at a homeotic gene in Drosophila.

Authors:  Margaret C W Ho; Holly Johnsen; Sara E Goetz; Benjamin J Schiller; Esther Bae; Diana A Tran; Andrey S Shur; John M Allen; Christoph Rau; Welcome Bender; William W Fisher; Susan E Celniker; Robert A Drewell
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.