Literature DB >> 11805612

Recruitment and early treatment in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury.

F H Geisler1, W P Coleman, G Grieco, D Poonian.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Post hoc secondary analysis of data from 1992 to 1998 in the trial of Sygen in Acute Spinal Cord Injury.
OBJECTIVES: Quasi-epidemiologic understanding of injury and treatment patterns and of recruitment in an SCI trial. No drug efficacy results. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The most recent large epidemiologic study was the National SCI Database by Stover and colleagues around 1980.
METHODS: Emphasis on descriptive, rather than inferential, statistics: consistent with secondary analysis.
RESULTS: The study involved 760 patients at 28 centers in North America. Cervical injuries were more common than thoracic, and complete injuries were more common than incomplete injuries. Recruitment in the complete cervical stratum was 332, but the incomplete thoracic strata had only 31 patients combined. Vital signs at arrival and on randomization show fair stability. Clock times show more injuries on weekends and nights but suggest immediate attention was given. Elapsed times to treatment (especially EMT and Medevac arrival) are short. The rate of direct admission to tertiary centers, traction weight, and time to surgery vary among centers. Inpatient rehabilitation appeared driven by insurance in addition to severity.
CONCLUSIONS: The imbalances in favor of cervical and of complete injuries would make it hard for studies to attain results for SCI in general. The vital signs and time patterns suggest local protocol-driven stabilization to prevent secondary physiologic injury early after SCI. Some features of care vary among centers, but the sparseness of prospective data in specific injury and treatment categories suggests that treatment guidelines have limited empirical support and should be made cautiously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11805612     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

Review 1.  A grading system to evaluate objectively the strength of pre-clinical data of acute neuroprotective therapies for clinical translation in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Brian K Kwon; Elena B Okon; Eve Tsai; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; David K Magnuson; Paul J Reier; Dana M McTigue; Phillip G Popovich; Andrew R Blight; Martin Oudega; James D Guest; Lynne C Weaver; Michael G Fehlings; Wolfram Tetzlaff
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 2.  The challenge of recruitment for neurotherapeutic clinical trials in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Andrew R Blight; Jane Hsieh; Armin Curt; James W Fawcett; James D Guest; Naomi Kleitman; Shekar N Kurpad; Brian K Kwon; Daniel P Lammertse; Norbert Weidner; John D Steeves
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Hemodynamic parameters and timing of surgical decompression in acute cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sagun Tuli; Jayshree Tuli; William P Coleman; Fred H Geisler; Andrei Krassioukov
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 4.  Neuroprotection and acute spinal cord injury: a reappraisal.

Authors:  Edward D Hall; Joe E Springer
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-01

5.  The Effect of Non-Gabapentinoid Anticonvulsants on Sensorimotor Recovery After Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Freda M Warner; Catherine R Jutzeler; Jacquelyn J Cragg; Bobo Tong; Lukas Grassner; Frank Bradke; Fred Geisler; John K Kramer
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 6.  Adaptive trial designs for spinal cord injury clinical trials directed to the central nervous system.

Authors:  James D Guest; John D Steeves; M J Mulcahey; Linda A T Jones; Frank Rockhold; Rϋediger Rupp; John L K Kramer; Steven Kirshblum; Andrew Blight; Daniel Lammertse
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 7.  Chemical priming for spinal cord injury: a review of the literature. Part I-factors involved.

Authors:  Martin M Mortazavi; Ketan Verma; Aman Deep; Fatemeh B Esfahani; Patrick R Pritchard; R Shane Tubbs; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Efficacy of surgical decompression in regard to motor recovery in the setting of conus medullaris injury.

Authors:  Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Alexander R Vaccaro; Mehdi Mohammadi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Serum albumin as a predictor of neurological recovery after spinal cord injury: a replication study.

Authors:  Catherine Jutzeler; John L K Kramer; Anh K Vo; Fred Geisler; Lukas Grassner; Jan Schwab; Gale Whiteneck
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 10.  Spinal cord injury: how can we improve the classification and quantification of its severity and prognosis?

Authors:  Vibhor Krishna; Hampton Andrews; Abhay Varma; Jacobo Mintzer; Mark S Kindy; James Guest
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.