Literature DB >> 11804635

Measuring and modelling the photopic flicker sensitivity of the chicken (Gallus g. domesticus).

John R Jarvis1, Nina R Taylor, Neville B Prescott, Ian Meeks, Christopher M Wathes.   

Abstract

The photopic flicker sensitivity of the chicken was determined using an operant conditioning psychophysical technique. The results show both high- and low-frequency fall-off in the sensitivity response, which peaked around 15 Hz. Flicker sensitivity was determined for a range of stimulus luminance levels, and directly compared to human flicker response measured under similar stimulus conditions. At five luminance levels (10, 100, 200, 500 and 1000 cd/m(2)), the overall chicken flicker sensitivity was found to be considerably lower than for humans, except at high frequencies. A greater degree of frequency tuning was also found in the chicken response. The critical flicker fusion values were either similar or slightly higher for chickens compared to humans (40.8, 50.4, 53.3, 58.2 and 57.4 Hz vs 39.2, 54.0, 54.0, 57.4 and 71.5 Hz respectively for humans and chickens for increasing stimulus luminance level). A recently proposed model for flicker sensitivity [Vision Research 39 (1999) 533], which incorporates low- and high-pass temporal filters in cascade, was found to be applicable to the chicken response. From this model, deductions were made concerning mechanisms controlling the transfer of temporal information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11804635     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00268-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Chicks use changes in luminance and chromatic contrast as indicators of the sign of defocus.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Blue Light Protects Against Temporal Frequency Sensitive Refractive Changes.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Stephanie Britton; Molly Spatcher; Stephan Hanowsky
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration.

Authors:  Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The role of temporal contrast and blue light in emmetropization.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Mark Henriksen; Tiffany Yanase; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Sensitivity of the avian motion system to light and dark stimuli.

Authors:  Jean-François Nankoo; Christopher R Madan; Marcia L Spetch; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Parasympathetic innervation of emmetropization.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Chris Taylor; Alexandra Kaser-Eichberger; Falk Schroedl
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Discrimination of flicker frequency rates in the reptile tuatara (Sphenodon ).

Authors:  Kevin L Woo; Maree Hunt; David Harper; Nicola J Nelson; Charles H Daugherty; Ben D Bell
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-12-13

9.  Coloured oil droplets enhance colour discrimination.

Authors:  Misha Vorobyev
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The role of dopamine in eye growth responses to color and luminance flicker in chicks.

Authors:  Kevin K Chuang; Frances J Rucker
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.467

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.