Literature DB >> 11801702

Combined 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine PET scans in patients with newly progressive metastatic prostate cancer.

Rodolfo Nuñez1, Homer A Macapinlac, Henry W D Yeung, Tim Akhurst, Shangde Cai, Iman Osman, Mithat Gonen, Elyn Riedel, Howard I Scher, Steven M Larson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Metastatic prostate cancer may respond initially to hormone suppression, with involution of tumor sites, but ultimate tumor progression is inevitable. Our aim was to detect the proportion of bone and soft-tissue lesions that represent metabolically active tumor sites in patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer.
METHODS: In a prospective study, we compared 18F-FDG and L-methyl-11C-methionine (11C-methionine) PET with conventional imaging modalities (CIM), which included the combination of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy, CT, or MRI. Twelve patients with prostate cancer, increasing levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and at least 1 site (index lesion) with new or increasing disease on CIM were studied. The total numbers of soft-tissue and bone-tissue lesions, in a site-by-site comparison, were calculated for all imaging modalities.
RESULTS: The sensitivities of 18F-FDG PET and 11C-methionine PET were 48% (167/348 lesions) and 72.1% (251/348 lesions), respectively, with CIM being used as the 100% reference (348/348). 11C-Methionine PET identified significantly more lesions than 18F-FDG PET (P < 0.01). All 12 patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer had at least 1 lesion site of active metabolism for 18F-FDG or 11C-methionine, which could be used as an index lesion to monitor the metabolic response to therapy. A significant proportion of lesions (26%) had no detectable metabolism of 18F-FDG or 11C-methionine. Although technical factors cannot be totally excluded, we believe that metabolically inactive sites may be necrotic or dormant. More than 95% (251/258) of metabolically active sites (72% of the total number of lesions detected by CIM) metabolize 11C-methionine. 18F-FDG uptake is more variable, with 65% of metabolically active sites (48% of the total number of lesions detected by CIM).
CONCLUSION: These findings reflect the different biologic characteristics of the lesions in a heterogeneous tumor such as prostate cancer and suggest that a time-dependent metabolic cascade may occur in advanced prostate cancer, with initial uptake of 11C-methionine in dormant sites followed by increased uptake of 18F-FDG during progression of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11801702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  38 in total

1.  3D Prostate Segmentation of Ultrasound Images Combining Longitudinal Image Registration and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Yang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-23

2.  Detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma with anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid PET/CT and 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Bital Savir-Baruch; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Raghuveer K Halkar; Peter J Rossi; Melinda M Lewis; Jonathon A Nye; Weiping Yu; F DuBois Bowman; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  [Choline PET/CT in the diagnosis of primary and recurrent prostate cancer. Are there evidence-based indications?].

Authors:  P J Olbert; J Heinis; R Hofmann; A Hegele
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  PET Tracers Beyond FDG in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Cristina Nanni; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 6.  Novel tracers and their development for the imaging of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Michael J Morris
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  New horizons in prostate cancer imaging.

Authors:  Gregory Ravizzini; Baris Turkbey; Karen Kurdziel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Antilipolytic drug boosts glucose metabolism in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kim Francis Andersen; Vadim Divilov; Jacek Koziorowski; NagaVaraKishore Pillarsetty; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hao Hong; Yin Zhang; Jiangtao Sun; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.