Literature DB >> 11801418

Sound motion evoked magnetic fields.

Jing Xiang1, Sylvester Chuang, Daniel Wilson, Hiroshi Otsubo, Elizabeth Pang, Stephanie Holowka, Rohit Sharma, Ayako Ochi, Shiro Chitoku.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of present study was to determine which brain regions are involved in the conscious perception of sound motion in humans.
METHODS: Six kinds of sound stimuli were studied. Two static sound stimuli with durations of 100 or 1000 ms remained at a fixed position during the stimulation period. Four moving sound stimuli with duration of 100 or 1000 ms were moving from left to right, or right to left, during the stimulation period. Evoked magnetic fields were recorded using a 151-channel whole cortex magnetoencephalographic system.
RESULTS: The response identified in all sound stimuli was M100. Responses identified only in moving sound stimuli were M180, M280 and M680. Contour maps and dipoles overlapped on magnetic resonance imaging indicated that both the M100 and M680 responses were generated in the superior temporal cortex (left and right), while M180 and M280 were generated in the parietal cortex (right).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this MEG study indicated that the right parietal cortex was involved in sound motion processing. We hypothesize that the right parietal cortex, in association with the left and right superior temporal cortex, forms a network to process sound motion information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11801418     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00709-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  7 in total

1.  Interhemisphere asymmetry of auditory evoked potentials in humans and mismatch negativity during sound source localization.

Authors:  S F Vaitulevich; L B Shestopalova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-12

2.  Dynamics of a temporo-fronto-parietal network during sustained spatial or spectral auditory processing.

Authors:  Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Spatially congruent visual motion modulates activity of the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Mikhail Zvyagintsev; Andrey R Nikolaev; Heike Thönnessen; Olga Sachs; Jürgen Dammers; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Auditory motion direction encoding in auditory cortex and high-level visual cortex.

Authors:  Arjen Alink; Felix Euler; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Wolf Singer; Axel Kohler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Age-related dissociation of sensory and decision-based auditory motion processing.

Authors:  Alexandra A Ludwig; Rudolf Rübsamen; Gerd J Dörrscheidt; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Effect of rotating acoustic stimulus on heart rate variability in healthy adults.

Authors:  Bhaskar Roy; Raghabendra Choudhuri; Ambarish Pandey; Sajal Bandopadhyay; Sasmit Sarangi; Sobhendu Kumar Ghatak
Journal:  Open Neurol J       Date:  2012-10-08

7.  Modeling the developmental patterns of auditory evoked magnetic fields in children.

Authors:  Rupesh Kotecha; Maria Pardos; Yingying Wang; Ting Wu; Paul Horn; David Brown; Douglas Rose; Ton deGrauw; Jing Xiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.