Literature DB >> 11800460

Fast and accurate measurement of taste and smell thresholds using a maximum-likelihood adaptive staircase procedure.

M R Linschoten1, L O Harvey, P M Eller, B W Jafek.   

Abstract

This paper evaluates the use of a maximum-likelihood adaptive staircase psychophysical procedure (ML-PEST), originally developed in vision and audition, for measuring detection thresholds in gustation and olfaction. The basis for the psychophysical measurement of thresholds with the ML-PEST procedure is developed. Then, two experiments and four simulations are reported. In the first experiment, ML-PEST was compared with the Wetherill and Levitt up-down staircase method and with the Cain ascending method of limits in the measurement of butyl alcohol thresholds. The four Monte Carlo simulations compared the three psychophysical procedures. In the second experiment, the test-retest reliability of MLPEST for measuring NaCl and butyl alcohol thresholds was assessed. The results indicate that the ML-PEST method gives reliable and precise threshold measurements. Its ability to detect malingerers shows considerable promise. It is recommended for use in clinical testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11800460     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

Review 1.  Olfactory dysfunction and its measurement in the clinic and workplace.

Authors:  Richard L Doty
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Validation of CT dose-reduction simulation.

Authors:  Parinaz Massoumzadeh; Steven Don; Charles F Hildebolt; Kyongtae T Bae; Bruce R Whiting
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A quantitative confidence signal detection model: 1. Fitting psychometric functions.

Authors:  Yongwoo Yi; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Olfactory impairments in patients with unilateral cerebellar lesions are selective to inputs from the contralesional nostril.

Authors:  Joel D Mainland; Bradley N Johnson; Rehan Khan; Richard B Ivry; Noam Sobel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Olfactory discrimination varies in mice with different levels of α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor expression.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hellier; Nicole L Arevalo; Megan J Blatner; An K Dang; Amy C Clevenger; Catherine E Adams; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Unexplained repeated pregnancy loss is associated with altered perceptual and brain responses to men's body-odor.

Authors:  Liron Rozenkrantz; Reut Weissgross; Tali Weiss; Inbal Ravreby; Idan Frumin; Sagit Shushan; Lior Gorodisky; Netta Reshef; Yael Holzman; Liron Pinchover; Yaara Endevelt-Shapira; Eva Mishor; Timna Soroka; Maya Finkel; Liav Tagania; Aharon Ravia; Ofer Perl; Edna Furman-Haran; Howard Carp; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Bach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.535

8.  Assessment of Taste Function.

Authors:  Y Zhu; T Hummel
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022

9.  Quantitative measurement of odor detection thresholds using an air dilution olfactometer, and association with genetic variants in a sample of diverse ancestry.

Authors:  Gillian R Cook; S Krithika; Melissa Edwards; Paula Kavanagh; Esteban J Parra
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Developing Bayesian adaptive methods for estimating sensitivity thresholds (d') in Yes-No and forced-choice tasks.

Authors:  Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Nina Tran; Barbara A Dosher; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.