Literature DB >> 11799897

[Glaucoma after extremely severe chemical and thermal eye burns. Surgical possibilities].

R Kuckelkorn1, G K Keller, C Redbrake.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Late secondary glaucomas after severe chemical or thermal eye burns are associated with diagnostic and surgical difficulties. Routine filtering surgery (trabeculectomy) has a low success rate. In these eyes aqueous shunt implantation and cyclophotocoagulation are alternative procedures. PATIENTS: In our retrospective study, the records of 12 patients with 14 severe eye burns (grade IV) were analyzed. Nine eyes were treated with an aqueous shunt device (six von Denffer and three Ahmed implants). Diode laser cyclophotocoagulation (Iris Medical Instruments) was performed in five eyes. The mean time interval between surgery and accident was 88.3 months (aqueous shunt) and 32.8 months (cyclophotocoagulation).
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 45 +/- 36 months (von Denffer implant), 38 +/- 5 months (Ahmed implant), and 11 +/- 8 months (cyclophotocoagulation). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was reduced from 39 +/- 7 to 23 +/- 6 (von Denffer implants) and from 38 +/- 3 to 8 +/- 10 (Ahmed implants). Mean IOP before treatment with cyclophotocoagulation was 33 +/- 8 and 18 +/- 2 after treatment. Systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors were stopped in all patients. Visual acuity deteriorated in five of nine eyes treated with aqueous shunt devices and was unchanged or better in all eyes treated with cyclophotocoagulation. Multiple re-operations were necessary after aqueous shunt implantation. Severe complications leading to failure in these eyes were encapsulated bleb in four eyes, expulsive hemorrhage in one eye, and phthisis in one eye. Cyclophotocoagulation was repeated in two eyes. Severe complications were not observed.
CONCLUSION: IOP reduction was effective and comparable in both procedures. Because of the high incidence of severe complications after shunt surgery, we prefer cyclophotocoagulation for the treatment of intractable glaucoma after severe eye burns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11799897     DOI: 10.1007/s003470170006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  5 in total

1.  [Chemical and thermal eye burns. Conservatíve and surgical options of a stage-dependent therapy].

Authors:  H G Struck; N F Schrage
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  An update on chemical eye burns.

Authors:  Mukhtar Bizrah; Ammar Yusuf; Sajjad Ahmad
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Current and Upcoming Therapies for Ocular Surface Chemical Injuries.

Authors:  Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Medi Eslani; Zeeshan Haq; Ebrahim Shirzadeh; Michael J Huvard; Ali R Djalilian
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 4.  Glaucoma after chemical burns and radiation.

Authors:  Cornel Ştefan; Cristina Mihaela Timaru; Daniela Adriana Iliescu; Speranta Schmitzer; Simone De Algerino; Mehdi Batras; Jalaladin Hosseini-Ramhormozi
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

5.  Glaucoma after ocular chemical burns: Incidence, risk factors, and outcome.

Authors:  Se Hyun Choi; Mee Kum Kim; Joo Youn Oh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.