AIMS: To assess current attitudes and practice toward antenatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk assessment, HIV testing and barriers towards implementation of these among midwives, general practitioners (GPs) and obstetricians in the upper South Island METHODS: A survey was conducted among maternity care providers by anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Most questions were dichotomous, forced choice or Likert scale format but there were four open- ended questions asking for a written response. RESULTS: The response rate was 57% overall. The main finding was that 275 (66%) of respondents assessed risk of HIV in less than 10% of patients, and 328 (midwives 93, 85%; GP's 226,77%; obstetricians 9,64%) respondents had performed less than three HIV tests in the past twelve months. Most respondents strongly agreed that detection of HIV during pregnancy is beneficial to mother 318 (83%) and to baby 367 (96%) and to mother prior to pregnancy 353 (92%). 202 (52%) supported and 44 (11%) were opposed to an antenatal screening programme in New Zealand. Most knew how to assess risk for HIV saw themselves as having an important role in antenatal HIV testing, and were comfortable performing risk assessment. Multiple reasons for current practices were offered, including perceived reluctance by women to be tested, lack of time, skills, knowledge and support services, and low rates of HIV in the community. CONCLUSIONS: The current policy of routine HIV risk assessment is not working among respondents. A systematic reassessment and implementation of a workable strategy needs to be undertaken in New Zealand.
AIMS: To assess current attitudes and practice toward antenatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk assessment, HIV testing and barriers towards implementation of these among midwives, general practitioners (GPs) and obstetricians in the upper South Island METHODS: A survey was conducted among maternity care providers by anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Most questions were dichotomous, forced choice or Likert scale format but there were four open- ended questions asking for a written response. RESULTS: The response rate was 57% overall. The main finding was that 275 (66%) of respondents assessed risk of HIV in less than 10% of patients, and 328 (midwives 93, 85%; GP's 226,77%; obstetricians 9,64%) respondents had performed less than three HIV tests in the past twelve months. Most respondents strongly agreed that detection of HIV during pregnancy is beneficial to mother 318 (83%) and to baby 367 (96%) and to mother prior to pregnancy 353 (92%). 202 (52%) supported and 44 (11%) were opposed to an antenatal screening programme in New Zealand. Most knew how to assess risk for HIV saw themselves as having an important role in antenatal HIV testing, and were comfortable performing risk assessment. Multiple reasons for current practices were offered, including perceived reluctance by women to be tested, lack of time, skills, knowledge and support services, and low rates of HIV in the community. CONCLUSIONS: The current policy of routine HIV risk assessment is not working among respondents. A systematic reassessment and implementation of a workable strategy needs to be undertaken in New Zealand.