Literature DB >> 11794558

Efficacy of inpatient and home treatment in psychiatrically disturbed children and adolescents. Follow-up assessment of the results of a controlled treatment study.

F Mattejat1, B R Hirt, J Wilken, M H Schmidt, H Remschmidt.   

Abstract

In two German child and adolescent psychiatric treatment and research centers, a controlled treatment study was conducted in which two randomized treatment groups (in-patient treatment and home treatment) were compared. Subjects were children and adolescents with severe psychiatric disorders, for whom normal outpatient treatment was not sufficient (mean age of the patients was 11 years and 9 months at the beginning of treatment). The results showed no differences in therapy outcome between the two treatment modalities. In a further study, the results of which are presented here, a follow-up assessment (average follow-up interval: 3 years and 8 months) of the two treatment groups (follow-up sample of the inpatient treatment group: n = 33; home treatment group: n = 35) was undertaken in order to investigate the course of the psychiatric disturbances and the long-term effects of the treatments. As measurement categories for the outcome "adaption at school" and "number of marked symptoms" were used in pre-, post- and follow-up assessment. The most important results are 1) The number of marked psychiatric symptoms and the adaptation at school or work exhibit the same type of course over time. Post-treatment scores are much better when compared to pre-treatment scores, but decline slightly upon follow-up, although they remain significantly better than the pre-treatment scores. Thus, the study shows that improvements relating to the psychiatric symptoms are quite stable after several years. 2) There were no relevant differences between the treatment modalities "inpatient treatment" and "home treatment" in terms of effect-size upon follow-up, and in inferential analysis. Any tendency towards difference was in favor of home treatment. So the results give strong support to the conclusion that at least for a specific group of patients (about 15% of those patients usually treated in an inpatient setting) residential treatment can be replaced by home treatment and that the long-term therapeutic outcome of home treatment is stable and persistent. Thus, in terms of psychiatric care and clinical practice, our results provide empirical support to the idea that home treatment should be used more frequently and much more broadly in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11794558     DOI: 10.1007/s007870170008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 1018-8827            Impact factor:   4.785


  9 in total

1.  Eliminating (almost) treatment dropout of substance abusing or dependent delinquents through home-based multisystemic therapy.

Authors:  S W Henggeler; S G Pickrel; M J Brondino; J L Crouch
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Home vs hospital care of children with behavior disorders. A controlled investigation.

Authors:  B G Winsberg; I Bialer; S Kupietz; E Botti; E B Balka
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1980-04

3.  Effectiveness of home treatment in children and adolescents with externalizing psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  B Lay; B Blanz; M H Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  Home-based multisystemic therapy as an alternative to the hospitalization of youths in psychiatric crisis: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  S W Henggeler; M D Rowland; J Randall; D M Ward; S G Pickrel; P B Cunningham; S L Miller; J Edwards; J J Zealberg; L D Hand; A B Santos
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  [Therapy evaluation in child and adolescent psychiatry: inpatient treatment, day care treatment and home treatment in comparison].

Authors:  H Remschmidt; M H Schmidt; F Mattejat; H G Eisert; M Eisert
Journal:  Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr       Date:  1988-09

6.  Effectiveness of nonresidential specialty mental health services for children and adolescents in the "real world".

Authors:  A Angold; E J Costello; B J Burns; A Erkanli; E M Farmer
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 8.829

7.  Effectiveness of a home program intervention for young children with autism.

Authors:  S Ozonoff; K Cathcart
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1998-02

8.  [Treatment of hyperkinetic children in the home environment].

Authors:  C Göpel; M H Schmidt; B Blanz; B Rettig
Journal:  Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother       Date:  1996-09

9.  Schizophrenia in children under 16 years.

Authors:  R R Kydd; J S Werry
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1982-12
  9 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses.

Authors:  Suzanne Murphy; Claire B Irving; Clive E Adams; Ron Driver
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

2.  Effectiveness of home treatment in children and adolescents with externalizing psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  B Lay; B Blanz; M H Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  Predictors and Moderators of Clinical Outcomes in Adolescents with Severe Mental Disorders After an Assertive Community Treatment.

Authors:  Sébastien Urben; Vanessa Baier; Gregory Mantzouranis; Eva Pigois; Caroline Graap; Fabienne Dutoit; Mélanie Cherix-Parchet; Coralie Henz; Aymeric Faucherand; Esperanza Senent; Laurent Holzer
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  Alternatives to inpatient mental health care for children and young people.

Authors:  Sasha Shepperd; Helen Doll; Simon Gowers; Anthony James; Mina Fazel; Ray Fitzpatrick; Jon Pollock
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

5.  CCSchool: a multicentre, prospective study on improving continuum of care in children and adolescents with mental health problems associated with school problems in Germany.

Authors:  Isabel Boege; Julia Herrmann; Julia Katharina Wolff; Ulrike Hoffmann; Michael Koelch; Marc Kurepkat; Steffen Lütte; Alexander Naumann; Hans Dieter Nolting; Jörg Michael Fegert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Efficacy of Parent-Infant-Psychotherapy with mothers with postpartum mental disorder: study protocol of the randomized controlled trial as part of the SKKIPPI project.

Authors:  J Mattheß; M Eckert; K Richter; G Koch; T Reinhold; P Vienhues; A Berghöfer; S Roll; T Keil; F Schlensog-Schuster; K von Klitzing; C Ludwig-Körner; L Kuchinke
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Intensive home treatment for adolescents in psychiatric crisis.

Authors:  Jet B Muskens; Pierre C M Herpers; Caroline Hilderink; Patricia A M van Deurzen; Jan K Buitelaar; Wouter G Staal
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Efficacy of parent-infant psychotherapy compared to care as usual in children with regulatory disorders in clinical and outpatient settings: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial as part of the SKKIPPI project.

Authors:  Mona Katharina Sprengeler; Janna Mattheß; Melanie Eckert; Katharina Richter; Gabriele Koch; Thomas Reinhold; Petra Vienhues; Anne Berghöfer; Julia Fricke; Stephanie Roll; Thomas Keil; Christiane Ludwig-Körner; Lars Kuchinke; Kai von Klitzing; Franziska Schlensog-Schuster
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 9.  Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses.

Authors:  Suzanne M Murphy; Claire B Irving; Clive E Adams; Muhammad Waqar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-03

Review 10.  Outcome domains in child mental health research since 1996: have they changed and why does it matter?

Authors:  Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood; Peter S Jensen; Mary C Acri; S Serene Olin; R Eric Lewandowski; Rachel J Herman
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 8.829

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.