Literature DB >> 11792972

Pig hematopoietic cell chimerism in baboons conditioned with a nonmyeloablative regimen and CD154 blockade.

L Bühler1, M Awwad, S Treter, Q Chang, M Basker, I P J Alwayn, K Teranishi, T Ericsson, K Moran, D Harper, B Kurilla-Mahon, C A Huang, R Sackstein, M Sykes, M E White-Scharf, D H Sachs, J D Down, D K Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to induce mixed hematopoietic chimerism and transplantation tolerance in the pig-to-primate model, we have infused high-dose porcine peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) into baboons pretreated with a nonmyeloablative regimen and anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb).
METHODS: Group 1 baboons (n=2) received a nonmyeloablative regimen including whole body irradiation, pharmacological immunosuppression, porcine hematopoietic growth factors, and immunoadsorption of anti-Galalpha1,3Gal (Gal) antibody before infusion of high doses of PBPC (2.7-4.6x10(10) cells/kg). In group 2 (n=5), cyclosporine was replaced by anti-CD154 mAb. Group 3 (n=3) received the group 1 regimen plus anti-CD154 mAb.
RESULTS: In group 1, pig chimerism was detected in the blood by flow cytometry (FACS) for 5 days (with a maximum of 14%), and continuously up to 13 days by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In group 2, pig chimerism was detectable for 5 days by FACS (maximum 33%) and continuously up to 28 days by PCR. In group 3, initial pig chimerism was detectable for 5 days by FACS (maximum 73%). Two of three baboons showed reappearance of pig cells on days 11 and 16, respectively. In one, in which no anti-Gal IgG could be detected for 30 days, pig cells were documented in the blood by FACS on days 16-22 (maximum 6% on day 19) and pig colony-forming cells were present in the blood on days 19-33, which we interpreted as evidence of engraftment. Microchimerism was continuous by PCR up to 33 days.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that there is no absolute barrier to pig hematopoietic cell engraftment in primates, and that this may be facilitated if the return of anti-Gal IgG can be prevented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11792972     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200201150-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  10 in total

1.  Occurrence of specific humoral non-responsiveness to swine antigens following administration of GalT-KO bone marrow to baboons.

Authors:  Adam Griesemer; Fan Liang; Atsushi Hirakata; Erica Hirsh; Diana Lo; Masayoshi Okumi; Megan Sykes; Kazuhiko Yamada; Christene A Huang; David H Sachs
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.907

2.  Persistence of Indirect but Not Direct T Cell Xenoresponses in Baboon Recipients of Pig Cell and Organ Transplants.

Authors:  L Buhler; B M-W Illigens; O Nadazdin; A Tena; S Lee; D H Sachs; D K C Cooper; G Benichou
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  IXA Honorary Member Lecture, 2017: The long and winding road to tolerance.

Authors:  Megan Sykes
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.907

4.  High incidence of xenogenic bone marrow engraftment in pig-to-baboon intra-bone bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  M Tasaki; I Wamala; A Tena; V Villani; M Sekijima; V Pathiraja; R A Wilkinson; S Pratts; T Cormack; E Clayman; J S Arn; A Shimizu; J A Fishman; D H Sachs; K Yamada
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Increased levels of anti-non-Gal IgG following pig-to-baboon bone marrow transplantation correlate with failure of engraftment.

Authors:  Fan Liang; Isaac Wamala; Joseph Scalea; Aseda Tena; Taylor Cormack; Shannon Pratts; Raimon Duran-Struuck; Nahel Elias; Martin Hertl; Christene A Huang; David H Sachs
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 6.  Achieving tolerance in pig-to-primate xenotransplantation: reality or fantasy.

Authors:  David H Sachs; Megan Sykes; Kazuhiko Yamada
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.708

Review 7.  Xenotransplantation: immunological hurdles and progress toward tolerance.

Authors:  Adam Griesemer; Kazuhiko Yamada; Megan Sykes
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 8.  Xenotransplantation tolerance: applications for recent advances in modified swine.

Authors:  Nathaly P Llore; Karina A Bruestle; Adam Griesemer
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Murine mobilized peripheral blood stem cells have a lower capacity than bone marrow to induce mixed chimerism and tolerance.

Authors:  Z Koporc; N Pilat; P Nierlich; P Blaha; S Bigenzahn; I Pree; E Selzer; M Sykes; F Muehlbacher; T Wekerle
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 10.  Xenotransplantation: infectious risk revisited.

Authors:  Jay A Fishman; Clive Patience
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.086

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.