Literature DB >> 11791829

Patient and carer satisfaction with 'hospital at home': quantitative and qualitative results from a randomised controlled trial.

Andrew Wilson1, Alison Wynn, Hilda Parker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 'Hospital At Home' schemes are set to increase in the United Kingdom (UK) in response to the NHS Plan. To date, little detailed work has been done on the acceptability of these schemes to patients and their carers. AIM: To compare Hospital at Home patient and carer satisfaction with hospital care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Consecutive patients assessed as suitablefor the Leicester Hospital at Home scheme were randomised to Hospital at Home or one of three acute hospitals in the city.
METHOD: Patient satisfaction was assessed two weeks after randomisation, or at discharge if later using a six-item questionnaire. Patients' and carers' views of the services were assessed by semistructured interviews.
RESULTS: One hundred and two patients were randomised to Hospital at Home and 97 to hospital. Forty-eight (47%) patients in the Hospital at Home arm and 35 (36%) in the hospital arm completed the satisfaction questionnaire, representing 96% and 85% of those eligible, respectively. Total scores were significantly higher in the Hospital at Home (median = 15) than in the hospital group (median = 12). (P<0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test.) Responses to all six questions favoured Hospital at Home, with all but one of these differences being statistically significant. In the Hospital at Homegroup, 24 patients and 18 of their carers were interviewed; in the hospital group 18 patients and seven of their carers were interviewed. Themes emerging from these interviews were that patients appreciated the more personal care and better communication offered by Hospital at Home and placed great value on staying at home, which was seen to be therapeutic. Patients largely felt safe in Hospital at Home, although some would have felt safer in hospital. Some patients and carers felt that better medical care would have been provided in hospital. Carers felt that the workload imposed by Hospital at Home was no greater than by hospital admission and that the relief from care duties at home would be counterbalanced by the added strain of hospital visiting.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction was greater with Hospital at Home than with hospital. Reasons included a more personal style of care and a feeling that staying at home was therapeutic. Carers did not feel that Hospital at Home imposed an extra workload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11791829      PMCID: PMC1314211     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  14 in total

1.  The hospital of the future. Better out than in? Alternatives to acute hospital care.

Authors:  M Hensher; N Fulop; J Coast; E Jefferys
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-23

2.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health.

Authors:  M Campbell; R Fitzpatrick; A Haines; A L Kinmonth; P Sandercock; D Spiegelhalter; P Tyrer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-16

3.  Randomised controlled trial of effectiveness of Leicester hospital at home scheme compared with hospital care.

Authors:  A Wilson; H Parker; A Wynn; C Jagger; N Spiers; J Jones; G Parker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-12-11

4.  Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-13

5.  How great a burden does early discharge to hospital-at-home impose on carers? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  D Gunnell; J Coast; S H Richards; T J Peters; J C Pounsford; M A Darlow
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Hospital in the home: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  G A Caplan; J A Ward; N J Brennan; J Coconis; N Board; A Brown
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  "Hospital at home" versus hospital care in patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  L Davies; M Wilkinson; S Bonner; P M Calverley; R M Angus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-18

8.  Patient satisfaction: care of the elderly.

Authors:  K M Forgan Morle
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Development and results of a questionnaire to measure carer satisfaction after stroke.

Authors:  P Pound; P Gompertz; S Ebrahim
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  National survey of hospital patients.

Authors:  S Bruster; B Jarman; N Bosanquet; D Weston; R Erens; T L Delbanco
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-12-10
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Admission avoidance hospital at home.

Authors:  Sasha Shepperd; Steve Iliffe; Helen A Doll; Mike J Clarke; Lalit Kalra; Andrew D Wilson; Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-01

2.  Hospital-at-Home: Multistakeholder Considerations for Program Dissemination and Scale.

Authors:  Kushal T Kadakia; Celynne A Balatbat; Albert L Siu; I Glenn Cohen; Consuelo H Wilkins; Victor J Dzau; Anaeze C Offodile 2nd
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults: a Qualitative Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  David M Levine; Julia Pian; Karthiyayini Mahendrakumar; Apexa Patel; Agustina Saenz; Jeffrey L Schnipper
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 6.473

4.  "It's very complicated": a qualitative study of medicines management in intermediate care facilities in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  Anna N Millar; Carmel M Hughes; Cristín Ryan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  The effect of a virtual ward program on emergency services utilization and quality of life in frail elderly patients after discharge: a pilot study.

Authors:  Doris Y P Leung; Diana Tze-Fan Lee; Iris F K Lee; Lai-Wah Lam; Susanna W Y Lee; May W M Chan; Yin-Ming Lam; Siu-Hung Leung; Pui-Chi Chiu; Nelly K F Ho; Ming-Fai Ip; May M Y Hui
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 6.  Admission avoidance hospital at home.

Authors:  Sasha Shepperd; Helen Doll; Robert M Angus; Mike J Clarke; Steve Iliffe; Lalit Kalra; Nicoletta Aimonino Ricauda; Andrew D Wilson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

7.  Home hospital as a disposition for older adults from the emergency department: Benefits and opportunities.

Authors:  Kei Ouchi; Shan Liu; Daniel Tonellato; Yonatan G Keschner; Maura Kennedy; David M Levine
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2021-07-21

8.  Patient, informal caregiver and care provider acceptance of a hospital in the home program in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Jacques Lemelin; William E Hogg; Simone Dahrouge; Catherine Deri Armstrong; Carmel M Martin; Wei Zhang; Jo-Anne Dusseault; Joy Parsons-Nicota; Raphael Saginur; Gary Viner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  The effectiveness of intermediate care including transitional care interventions on function, healthcare utilisation and costs: a scoping review.

Authors:  Duygu Sezgin; Rónán O'Caoimh; Aaron Liew; Mark R O'Donovan; Maddelena Illario; Mohamed A Salem; Siobhán Kennelly; Ana María Carriazo; Luz Lopez-Samaniego; Cristina Arnal Carda; Rafael Rodriguez-Acuña; Marco Inzitari; Teija Hammar; Anne Hendry
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 1.710

10.  Perceptions of Hospital-at-Home Among Stakeholders: a Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Crystal Min Siu Chua; Stephanie Qianwen Ko; Yi Feng Lai; Yee Wei Lim; Shefaly Shorey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.