Literature DB >> 11790857

Cluster analysis of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data using self-organizing maps: application to prostate carcinomas.

T Mattfeldt1, H Wolter, R Kemmerling, H W Gottfried, H A Kestler.   

Abstract

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a modern genetic method which enables a genome-wide survey of chromosomal imbalances. For each chromosome region, one obtains the information whether there is a loss or gain of genetic material, or whether there is no change at that region. Usually it is not possible to evaluate all 46 chromosomes of a metaphase, therefore several (up to 20 or more) metaphases are analyzed per individual, and expressed as average. Mostly one does not study one individual alone but groups of 20-30 individuals. Therefore, large amounts of data quickly accumulate which must be put into a logical order. In this paper we present the application of a self-organizing map (Genecluster) as a tool for cluster analysis of data from pT2N0 prostate cancer cases studied by CGH. Self-organizing maps are artificial neural networks with the capability to form clusters on the basis of an unsupervised learning rule, i.e., in our examples it gets the CGH data as only information (no clinical data). We studied a group of 40 recent cases without follow-up, an older group of 20 cases with follow-up, and the data set obtained by pooling both groups. In all groups good clusterings were found in the sense that clinically similar cases were placed into the same clusters on the basis of the genetic information only. The data indicate that losses on chromosome arms 6q, 8p and 13q are all frequent in pT2N0 prostatic cancer, but the loss on 8p has probably the largest prognostic importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11790857      PMCID: PMC4617519          DOI: 10.1155/2001/852674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol        ISSN: 0921-8912            Impact factor:   2.916


  6 in total

1.  Prediction of the axillary lymph node status in mammary cancer on the basis of clinicopathological data and flow cytometry.

Authors:  T Mattfeldt; H A Kestler; H P Sinn
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Chromosomal localization of DNA amplifications in neuroblastoma tumors using cDNA microarray comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Ben Beheshti; Ilan Braude; Paula Marrano; Paul Thorner; Maria Zielenska; Jeremy A Squire
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Stability-based comparison of class discovery methods for DNA copy number profiles.

Authors:  Isabel Brito; Philippe Hupé; Pierre Neuvial; Emmanuel Barillot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Molecular classification of hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer, using nonnegative matrix factorization molecular subtyping of primary and metastatic specimens.

Authors:  Kobe C Yuen; Ben Tran; Angelyn Anton; Habib Hamidi; Anthony J Costello; Niall M Corcoran; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Natalie Rainey; Marie C G Semira; Peter Gibbs; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Shahneen Sandhu; Edward E Kadel
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.012

5.  Classification and feature selection algorithms for multi-class CGH data.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Sanjay Ranka; Tamer Kahveci
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Genomic imbalances in 5918 malignant epithelial tumors: an explorative meta-analysis of chromosomal CGH data.

Authors:  Michael Baudis
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.