Literature DB >> 11789954

Wolf spiders show graded antipredator behavior in the presence of chemical cues from different sized predators.

M H Persons1, A L Rypstra.   

Abstract

The wolf spider, Pardosa milvina, displays effective antipredator behavior (reduced activity) in the presence of silk and excreta cues from adults of another cooccurring wolf spider, Hogna helluo. However, Pardosa and Hogna engage in size-structured intraguild predation, where Pardosa may be either the prey or predator of Hogna. We tested the ability of adult female Pardosa to vary antipredator responses toward kairomones produced by Hogna that vary in size. Hogna were maintained on filter paper for 24 hr. We then presented the paper to adult female Pardosa simultaneously paired with a blank sheet of paper. One treatment had two sheets of blank paper to serve as a control. The Hogna stimulus treatments were as follows (N = 15/treatment): (1) 1 Hogna half the mass of Pardosa; (2) 1 Hogna of equal mass of a Pardosa; (3) 1 adult Hogna, 30 times the mass of Pardosa; and (4) 8 Hogna each 0.25 the mass of Pardosa. Pardosa decreased activity in the presence of kairomones from Hogna of equal or larger size, but showed no change in activity in the presence of a blank control or from a single Hogna smaller than itself. Pardosa showed a reduction in activity in the presence of cues from eight small Hogna. Pardosa avoided substrates with adult Hogna cues, but showed no avoidance response to any other treatment. These results suggest that Pardosa is showing graded antipredator behavior relative to the quantity of predator kairomones present rather than directly discriminating among the different sizes of the predator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11789954     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013679532070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  7 in total

1.  Predator-induced life-history shifts in a freshwater snail.

Authors:  T A Crowl; A P Covich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  To hide or not to hide? Refuge use in a fluctuating environment.

Authors:  A Sih
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs.

Authors:  J P Caldwell; J H Thorp; T O Jervey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Perceived predation risk as a function of predator dietary cues in terrestrial salamanders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Diet of a polyphagous arthropod predator affects refuge seeking of its thrips prey.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae: Lycosidae).

Authors:  M. H. Persons; S. E. Walker; A. L. Rypstra; S. D. Marshall
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Predation risk and alternative mating tactics in male Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  J-G J Godin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total
  15 in total

1.  Biphasic activity of a jumping spider.

Authors:  Toshinori Okuyama
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-11-18

2.  Herbivore release through cascading risk effects.

Authors:  Martin H Schmidt-Entling; Eva Siegenthaler
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Glyphosate-based herbicide has contrasting effects on prey capture by two co-occurring wolf spider species.

Authors:  Sandra Rittman; Kerri M Wrinn; Samuel C Evans; Alex W Webb; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Distribution and oviposition site selection by predatory mites in the presence of intraguild predators.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Fine-scale behavioural adjustments of prey on a continuum of risk.

Authors:  Maud I A Kent; James E Herbert-Read; Gordon McDonald; A Jamie Wood; Ashley J W Ward
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Predator population size structure alters consumption of prey from epigeic and grazing food webs.

Authors:  Shannon M Murphy; Danny Lewis; Gina M Wimp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Field evidence of an airborne enemy-avoidance kairomone in wolf spiders.

Authors:  Kenneth W Schonewolf; Ryan Bell; Ann L Rypstra; Matthew H Persons
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Tessa van der Hammen; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Chemosensory cues of predators and competitors influence search for refuge in fruit by the coconut mite Aceria guerreronis.

Authors:  Érica C Calvet; Debora B Lima; José W S Melo; Manoel G C Gondim
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.132

10.  Integration of multiple cues allows threat-sensitive anti-intraguild predator responses in predatory mites.

Authors:  Andreas Walzer; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.