Literature DB >> 11789513

Comment on a view favoring ignorance of genetic information: confidentiality, autonomy, beneficence and the right not to know.

M C Bottis1.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 11789513     DOI： 10.1163/15718090020523133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Law        ISSN： 0929-0273


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Decision-making about inherited cancer risk: exploring dimensions of genetic responsibility.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Fiona Miller; Sonya deLaat; Brenda Wilson; June Carroll; Mario Cappelli
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Consent to epistemic interventions: a contribution to the debate on the right (not) to know.

Authors:  Niels Nijsingh
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-03

Review 3.  Attitudes of health care professionals toward pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Nathalie K Zgheib; Thalia Arawi; Rami A Mahfouz; Ramzi Sabra
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 4.  Guidelines for disclosing genetic information to family members: from development to use.

Authors:  Béatrice Godard; Thierry Hurlimann; Martin Letendre; Nathalie Egalité
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Ignorance, information and autonomy.

Authors:  J Harris; K Keywood
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-09

6.  Incidental findings of uncertain significance: To know or not to know--that is not the question.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.652
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.