Literature DB >> 11788992

Comprehensive analysis of complex proteomes using microscale solution isoelectrofocusing prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional electrophoresis.

Xun Zuo1, David W Speicher.   

Abstract

Comprehensive analysis of complex proteomes requires prefractionation of samples prior to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE). This study demonstrates the utility of using a high resolution sample prefractionation method and slightly overlapping narrow pH range two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to enhance quantitative comparisons of complex proteomes. A key feature of this strategy is to prefractionate samples into a few well-defined pools using microscale solution isoelectric focusing (nusol-IEF) prior to 2-DE protein analysis. Sample prefractionation is achieved using a series of tandem small volume chambers (500 nuL) separated by thin membranes containing immobilines at specific pH's. The resulting well-resolved fractionated samples are optimally separated on a series of slightly overlapping narrow pH range immobilized pH gradient (IPG) gels, which are approximately 0.1 pH units wider than the nusol-IEF fractionated pools. When nusol-IEF prefractionation was applied to proteome analyses of mouse serum, it resulted in the capacity to separate much higher protein loads on narrow pH range IPG gels while retaining good resolution and spot recovery. More importantly, the prefractionation of serum greatly enhanced the ability to detect low abundance proteins, because major interfering proteins were removed from most fractions. At least 6- to 30-fold higher protein loads were possible for nonalbumin fractions on narrow pH range IPG gels. The dynamic range of protein detection is substantially increased since higher protein loads can be applied to narrow pH range 2-DE gels, and duplicate gels can be stained with colloidal Coomassie and silver stains for quantitation of abundant and minor proteins, respectively. Finally, the ability to effectively fractionate complex proteomes into very narrow ranges (< 0.5 pH units) strongly suggests that nusol-IEF could be used to prefractionate complex samples for subsequent direct analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods as an alternative to using overlapping narrow pH range 2-DE gels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11788992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  15 in total

Review 1.  Disease proteomics toward bedside reality.

Authors:  Toshihide Nishimura; Atsushi Ogiwara; Kiyonaga Fujii; Takao Kawakami; Takeshi Kawamura; Hisae Anyouji; Harubumi Kato
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Using size exclusion chromatography-RPLC and RPLC-CIEF as two-dimensional separation strategies for protein profiling.

Authors:  David C Simpson; Seonghee Ahn; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic; Bogdan Bogdanov; Heather M Mottaz; Andrey N Vilkov; Gordon A Anderson; Mary S Lipton; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Sample complexity reduction for two-dimensional electrophoresis using solution isoelectric focusing prefractionation.

Authors:  Matthew R Richardson; Sean Liu; Heather N Ringham; Victor Chan; Frank A Witzmann
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  A systems biology analysis of metastatic melanoma using in-depth three-dimensional protein profiling.

Authors:  Mee-Jung Han; Huan Wang; Lynn A Beer; Hsin-Yao Tang; Meenhard Herlyn; David W Speicher
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Systematic comparison of the human saliva and plasma proteomes.

Authors:  Weihong Yan; Rolf Apweiler; Brian M Balgley; Pinmanee Boontheung; Jonathan L Bundy; Benjamin J Cargile; Steve Cole; Xueping Fang; Mireya Gonzalez-Begne; Timothy J Griffin; Fred Hagen; Shen Hu; Lawrence E Wolinsky; Cheng S Lee; Daniel Malamud; James E Melvin; Rajasree Menon; Michael Mueller; Renli Qiao; Nelson L Rhodus; Joel R Sevinsky; David States; James L Stephenson; Shawn Than; John R Yates; Weixia Yu; Hongwei Xie; Yongming Xie; Gilbert S Omenn; Joseph A Loo; David T Wong
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  A proteomics view of the molecular mechanisms and biomarkers of glaucomatous neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Gülgün Tezel
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 21.198

7.  Immobilized pH gradient-driven paper-based IEF: a new method for fractionating complex peptide mixtures before MS analysis.

Authors:  Beerelli Seshi; Kumaraguru Raja; Kh Chandramouli
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.988

8.  A proteomic analysis of Curcuma comosa Roxb. rhizomes.

Authors:  Apaporn Boonmee; Chantragan Srisomsap; Daranee Chokchaichamnankit; Aphichart Karnchanatat; Polkit Sangvanich
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Comparison of extensive protein fractionation and repetitive LC-MS/MS analyses on depth of analysis for complex proteomes.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Tony Chang-Wong; Hsin-Yao Tang; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Proteomic analysis of colorectal cancer: prefractionation strategies using two-dimensional free-flow electrophoresis.

Authors:  Robert L Moritz; Anita R Skandarajah; Hong Ji; Richard J Simpson
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2005
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.