Literature DB >> 11788986

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: old, old fashioned, but it still climbs up the mountains.

Thierry Rabilloud1.   

Abstract

Proteomics has traditionally used the separating power of two-dimensional electrophoresis for the quantitative analysis of protein amounts in complex extracts. However, the limitations of this approach in terms of throughput and analyzable protein range have elicited the development of other proteomics approaches, based either on peptide separations instead of protein separations, or based on direct protein recognition and selection on dedicated arrays (protein chips). These recent methods seem very promising, and probably look more promising than they will ultimately be, just because their weaknesses are not fully characterized yet. The purpose of this paper is thus to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of all the proteomics approaches proposed to date and to try to deduce the respective niches in proteomics that these approaches will have in the future.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11788986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  100 in total

Review 1.  Current perspectives in cancer proteomics.

Authors:  Miriam V Dwek; Sarah L Rawlings
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  A mass spectrometric journey into protein and proteome research.

Authors:  Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Comprehensive proteome expression profiling of undifferentiated versus differentiated neural stem cells from adult rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Martin H Maurer; Robert E Feldmann; Carsten D Fütterer; Jo Butlin; Wolfgang Kuschinsky
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Comparative proteomics analysis of serum proteins in ulcerative colitis patients.

Authors:  Nan Li; Xueming Wang; Yuefan Zhang; Junshan Zhai; Tuo Zhang; Kaihua Wei
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Proteomic analysis for the study of amniotic fluid protein composition.

Authors:  Marzia Perluigi; Fabio Di Domenico; Chiara Cini; Raffaella Coccia; Francesca Romana Giorlandino; Maurizio Giorlandino; Pietro Cignini; Alvaro Mesoraca; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2009-07

6.  Combined analysis of transcriptome and proteome data as a tool for the identification of candidate biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Barbara Seliger; Sven P Dressler; Ena Wang; Roland Kellner; Christian V Recktenwald; Friedrich Lottspeich; Francesco M Marincola; Maja Baumgärtner; Derek Atkins; Rudolf Lichtenfels
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 7.  Top Down proteomics: facts and perspectives.

Authors:  Adam D Catherman; Owen S Skinner; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Mesoporous silica chips for selective enrichment and stabilization of low molecular weight proteome.

Authors:  Ali Bouamrani; Ye Hu; Ennio Tasciotti; Li Li; Ciro Chiappini; Xuewu Liu; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  Tailoring of the nanotexture of mesoporous silica films and their functionalized derivatives for selectively harvesting low molecular weight protein.

Authors:  Ye Hu; Ali Bouamrani; Ennio Tasciotti; Li Li; Xuewu Liu; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 10.  Silicon micro- and nanofabrication for medicine.

Authors:  Daniel Fine; Alessandro Grattoni; Randy Goodall; Shyam S Bansal; Ciro Chiappini; Sharath Hosali; Anne L van de Ven; Srimeenkashi Srinivasan; Xuewu Liu; Biana Godin; Louis Brousseau; Iman K Yazdi; Joseph Fernandez-Moure; Ennio Tasciotti; Hung-Jen Wu; Ye Hu; Steve Klemm; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 9.933

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.