Literature DB >> 11788254

Preoperative risk prediction and intraoperative events in cardiac surgery.

Serban C Stoica1, Linda D Sharples, Ishtaq Ahmed, François Roques, Stephen R Large, Samer A M Nashef.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between preoperative risk prediction and intraoperative events.
METHODS: A total of 3118 patients operated in 1999 and 2000 at our institution were analysed, all of whom had their EuroSCORE collected prospectively. The intraoperative variables studied were consultant or trainee operating, long bypass time, long ischaemic time, return on bypass in theatre and use of intra-aortic balloon pump at the end of the procedure. The outcomes are reported as hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay in the intensive therapy unit (pLOS-ITU, >48 h) and death or pLOS-ITU. Risk models were constructed by logistic regression for predicting these three outcomes.
RESULTS: With the exception of prolonged cross-clamp time, all variables analysed were independently predictive of a negative outcome. Trainee operating had an apparent protective effect. All risk models performed well. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (95% CI) increased from 0.857 (0.81, 0.90) for EuroSCORE to 0.874 (0.83, 0.92) for the risk of death model. Similarly, the area under the ROC curve for the pLOS-ITU model increased from 0.687 (0.642, 0.732) to 0.734 (0.691, 0.777) and for the death or pLOS-ITU model from 0.717 (0.677, 0.756) to 0.757 (0.719, 0.795).
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of adverse intraoperative events enhances preoperative risk prediction. This type of analysis could be used for identifying "near miss" outcomes in adult cardiac surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11788254     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)01077-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  8 in total

1.  Octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery outlive their peers: a case for early referral.

Authors:  S C Stoica; F Cafferty; J Kitcat; R J F Baskett; M Goddard; L D Sharples; F C Wells; S A M Nashef
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Combined cardiothoracic surgery and interventions of the para/thyroid gland. A rare clinical cooperation.

Authors:  J Litmathe; M Kurt; U Boeken; A Roehrborn; P Feindt; E Gams
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-01

3.  Effect of training on patient outcomes following lobectomy.

Authors:  N Chaudhuri; A D Grayson; R Grainger; N K Mediratta; M H Carr; A S Soorae; R D Page
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Cardiac surgical patients are not the same. But who knows that: the patient, the cardiologist or the surgeon?

Authors:  Haralabos Parissis; Bassel Al-Alao
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-29

5.  Coronary artery bypass surgery in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Alper Sami Kunt; Osman Tansel Darcin; Mehmet Halit Andac
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-08-26

6.  Optimizing intensive care capacity using individual length-of-stay prediction models.

Authors:  Mark Van Houdenhoven; Duy-Tien Nguyen; Marinus J Eijkemans; Ewout W Steyerberg; Hugo W Tilanus; Diederik Gommers; Gerhard Wullink; Jan Bakker; Geert Kazemier
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Combination of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) and Cardiac Surgery Score (CASUS) to Improve Outcome Prediction in Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Fabian Doerr; Matthias B Heldwein; Ole Bayer; Anton Sabashnikov; Alexander Weymann; Pascal M Dohmen; Thorsten Wahlers; Khosro Hekmat
Journal:  Med Sci Monit Basic Res       Date:  2015-08-17

Review 8.  Cardiac surgery risk-stratification models.

Authors:  Carla Prins; I de Villiers Jonker; Lezelle Botes; Francis E Smit
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.167

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.