Literature DB >> 11786027

Why are proteins so robust to site mutations?

Darin M Taverna1, Richard A Goldstein.   

Abstract

There have been repeated observations that proteins are surprisingly robust to site mutations, enduring significant numbers of substitutions with little change in structure, stability, or function. These results are almost paradoxical in light of what is known about random heteropolymers and the sensitivity of their properties to seemingly trivial mutations. To address this discrepancy, the preservation of biological protein properties in the presence of mutation has been interpreted as indicating the independence of selective pressure on such properties. Such results also lead to the prediction that de novo protein design should be relatively easy, in contrast to what is observed. Here, we use a computational model with lattice proteins to demonstrate how this robustness can result from population dynamics during the evolutionary process. As a result, sequence plasticity may be a characteristic of evolutionarily derived proteins and not necessarily a property of designed proteins. This suggests that this robustness must be re-interpreted in evolutionary terms, and has consequences for our understanding of both in vivo and in vitro protein evolution. Copyright 2002 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11786027     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  62 in total

1.  Correlation between sequence hydrophobicity and surface-exposure pattern of database proteins.

Authors:  Susanne Moelbert; Eldon Emberly; Chao Tang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Roles of mutation and recombination in the evolution of protein thermodynamics.

Authors:  Yu Xia; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Funnel-like organization in sequence space determines the distributions of protein stability and folding rate preferred by evolution.

Authors:  Yu Xia; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-04-01

4.  Hidden complexity of free energy surfaces for peptide (protein) folding.

Authors:  Sergei V Krivov; Martin Karplus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The interface of protein structure, protein biophysics, and molecular evolution.

Authors:  David A Liberles; Sarah A Teichmann; Ivet Bahar; Ugo Bastolla; Jesse Bloom; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Lucy J Colwell; A P Jason de Koning; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Julian Echave; Arne Elofsson; Dietlind L Gerloff; Richard A Goldstein; Johan A Grahnen; Mark T Holder; Clemens Lakner; Nicholas Lartillot; Simon C Lovell; Gavin Naylor; Tina Perica; David D Pollock; Tal Pupko; Lynne Regan; Andrew Roger; Nimrod Rubinstein; Eugene Shakhnovich; Kimmen Sjölander; Shamil Sunyaev; Ashley I Teufel; Jeffrey L Thorne; Joseph W Thornton; Daniel M Weinreich; Simon Whelan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Visualizing high error levels during gene expression in living bacterial cells.

Authors:  Mor Meyerovich; Gideon Mamou; Sigal Ben-Yehuda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Robustness versus evolvability: a paradigm revisited.

Authors:  Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Linus Kramer
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2010-05-07

8.  Statistical mechanics of integral membrane protein assembly.

Authors:  Karim Wahba; David Schwab; Robijn Bruinsma
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Divergent evolution within protein superfolds inferred from profile-based phylogenetics.

Authors:  Douglas L Theobald; Deborah S Wuttke
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  On the conservative nature of intragenic recombination.

Authors:  D Allan Drummond; Jonathan J Silberg; Michelle M Meyer; Claus O Wilke; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.