Literature DB >> 11783637

Identification and quantification of estrogen receptor agonists in wastewater effluents.

S A Snyder1, D L Villeneuve, E M Snyder, J P Giesy.   

Abstract

Total concentrations of several known xenobiotic estrogen receptor (ER) agonists and natural and synthetic estrogen were measured in water by use of a combination of instrumental and bioanalytical approaches. Samples from 3 municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in south central Michigan (upstream and effluent); 4 point source locations on the Trenton Channel of the Detroit River, MI; and 5 locations in Lake Mead, NV were analyzed. Organic compounds were extracted from 5 L water samples using solid-phase extraction disks and separated into three fractions based on polarity. Whole extracts and fractions were tested for ER agonist potency using the MVLN in vitro bioassay. ER agonist potency was characterized by comparing the magnitude of induction elicited by the extract or fraction to the maximum induction caused by 17beta-estradiol (E2). The greatest concentrations of ER agonists were associated with the most polar fraction (F3). Instrumental analyses and further fractionation were used to identify specific ER agonists associated with bioassay responses. Bioassay data were compared to extract concentrations in order minimize variability associated with the extraction procedure. Concentrations of endogenous estrogen, E2, and the synthetic estrogen ethynylestradiol (EE2) ranged from nondetectable to 14.6 ng/mL extract (nondetectable to 3.66 ng/L water) and represented from 88 to 99.5% of the total estrogen equivalents in the water samples analyzed. Concentrations of alkylphenols (APs) ranged from nondetectable to 148 microg/mL extract (nondetectable to 37,000 ng/L water). In general, alkylphenols contributed less than 0.5% of the total estrogen equivalents in the water samples. Both bioassay-directed fractionation results and comparison of ER agonist concentrations, adjusted for their known relative potencies, support the conclusion that E2 and EE2 were the dominant environmental estrogens in water samples from mid-Michigan and Lake Mead, NV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11783637     DOI: 10.1021/es001254n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  18 in total

1.  Effect-directed analysis (EDA) in aquatic ecotoxicology: state of the art and future challenges.

Authors:  Markus Hecker; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Total estrogenic activity and nonylphenol concentration in the Donggang River, Taiwan.

Authors:  Meei-Fang Shue; Fu-An Chen; Ting-Chien Chen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Evaluation of estrogenic activity in the Pearl River by using effect-directed analysis.

Authors:  Xiao -Wen Chen; Jian-Liang Zhao; You-Sheng Liu; Li-Xin Hu; Shuang-Shuang Liu; Guang-Guo Ying
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Procedures of determining organic trace compounds in municipal sewage sludge-a review.

Authors:  Petra C Lindholm-Lehto; Heidi S J Ahkola; Juha S Knuutinen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Bioactive contaminants of emerging concern in National Park waters of the northern Colorado Plateau, USA.

Authors:  Rebecca H Weissinger; Brett R Blackwell; Kristen Keteles; William A Battaglin; Paul M Bradley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Assessment of estrogenic contamination and biological effects in Lake Taihu.

Authors:  Guanghua Lu; Zhenhua Yan; Yonghua Wang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  In vitro bioassays to evaluate complex chemical mixtures in recycled water.

Authors:  Ai Jia; Beate I Escher; Frederic D L Leusch; Janet Y M Tang; Erik Prochazka; Bingfeng Dong; Erin M Snyder; Shane A Snyder
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Toxic masking and synergistic modulation of the estrogenic activity of chemical mixtures in a yeast estrogen screen (YES).

Authors:  Tobias Frische; Michael Faust; Wiebke Meyer; Thomas Backhaus
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 9.  Tamoxifen resistance and epigenetic modifications in breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Eric Badia; Joan Oliva; Patrick Balaguer; Vincent Cavaillès
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Using Estrogenic Activity and Nontargeted Chemical Analysis to Identify Contaminants in Sewage Sludge.

Authors:  Gabrielle P Black; Guochun He; Michael S Denison; Thomas M Young
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.