Literature DB >> 11782052

Two goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models with continuous covariates.

Erik Pulkstenis1, Timothy J Robinson.   

Abstract

Assessing goodness-of-fit in logistic regression models can be problematic, in that commonly used deviance or Pearson chi-square statistics do not have approximate chi-square distributions, under the null hypothesis of no lack of fit, when continuous covariates are modelled. We present two easy to implement test statistics similar to the deviance and Pearson chi-square tests that are appropriate when continuous covariates are present. The methodology uses an approach similar to that incorporated by the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test in that observations are classified into distinct groups according to fitted probabilities, allowing sufficient cell sizes for chi-square testing. The major difference is that the proposed tests perform this grouping within the cross-classification of all categorical covariates in the model and, in some situations, allow for a more powerful assessment of where model predicted and observed counts may differ. A variety of simulations are performed comparing the proposed tests to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11782052     DOI: 10.1002/sim.943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  Integrating the predictiveness of a marker with its performance as a classifier.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng; Ying Huang; Gary Longton; Ross Prentice; Ian M Thompson; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Modeling the proportion of cut slopes rock on forest roads using artificial neural network and ordinal linear regression.

Authors:  R Babapour; R Naghdi; I Ghajar; R Ghodsi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Use of the sequential organ failure assessment score as a severity score.

Authors:  André Carlos Kajdacsy-Balla Amaral; Fábio Moreira Andrade; Rui Moreno; Antonio Artigas; Francis Cantraine; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; Lakshmi Ananth; Paul G Barnett
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Vertebral fracture in postmenopausal Chinese women: a population-based study.

Authors:  L Cui; L Chen; W Xia; Y Jiang; L Cui; W Huang; W Wang; X Wang; Y Pei; X Zheng; Q Wang; Z Ning; M Li; O Wang; X Xing; Q Lin; W Yu; X Weng; L Xu; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The utility of Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale amongst patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM): An experience from a teaching hospital in Southern India.

Authors:  Lydiya Thomas; Hesarghatta S Asha; Raja E Amalraj; R Prakash; Prakash Abraham; Nihal Thomas
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.