Literature DB >> 11781400

Brain death worldwide: accepted fact but no global consensus in diagnostic criteria.

Eelco F M Wijdicks1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To survey brain death criteria throughout the world.
BACKGROUND: The clinical diagnosis of brain death allows organ donation or withdrawal of support. Declaration of brain death follows a certain set of examinations. The code of practice throughout the world has not been systematically investigated.
METHODS: Brain death guidelines in adults in 80 countries were obtained through review of literature and legal standards and personal contacts with physicians.
RESULTS: Legal standards on organ transplantation were present in 55 of 80 countries (69%). Practice guidelines for brain death for adults were present in 70 of 80 countries (88%). More than one physician was required to declare brain death in half of the practice guidelines. Countries with guidelines all specifically specified exclusion of confounders, irreversible coma, absent motor response, and absent brainstem reflexes. Apnea testing, using a PCO(2) target, was recommended in 59% of the surveyed countries. Differences were also found in time of observation and required expertise of examining physicians. Additional provisions existed when brain death was due to anoxia. Confirmatory laboratory testing was mandatory in 28 of 70 practice guidelines (40%).
CONCLUSION: There is uniform agreement on the neurologic examination with exception of the apnea test. However, this survey found other major differences in the procedures for diagnosing brain death in adults. Standardization should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11781400     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.58.1.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  99 in total

1.  Diagnosing brain death without a neurologist.

Authors:  Holger Baumgartner; Franz Gerstenbrand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-22

Review 2.  Neurological consultations in the medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Saif S M Razvi; Ian Bone
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Advancing toward a modern death: the path from severe brain injury to neurological determination of death.

Authors:  Sam D Shemie; Christopher Doig; Philip Belitsky
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Maternal brain death: medical, ethical and legal issues.

Authors:  Alan Lane; Andrew Westbrook; Deirdre Grady; Rory O'Connor; Timothy J Counihan; Brian Marsh; John G Laffey
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-24       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  The Case for Reasonable Accommodation of Conscientious Objections to Declarations of Brain Death.

Authors:  L Syd M Johnson
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Defining death: when physicians and families differ.

Authors:  J M Appel
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  A critique of ancillary tests for brain death.

Authors:  G Bryan Young; Donald Lee
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 8.  Lessons learned from the case of Theresa Marie Schiavo: one palliative care doctor's perspective.

Authors:  Sharon M Weinstein
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2005-08

Review 9.  Maternal brain death--an Irish perspective.

Authors:  R Farragher; B Marsh; J G Laffey
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 10.  Computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of brain death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas H Kramer; Derek J Roberts
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.